Bridge Realization Estimate
ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)
Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $87.3M (vs $124.7M modeled).
EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers
Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).
Lever Detail
Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.
| Lever | Current | Target | Revenue | Cost | EBITDA | WC | Ramp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost to Collect | 4.5% DEFAULT | 2.5% BENCHMARK | $0 | $47.4M | $47.4M | $0 | 12mo |
| Denial Rate Reduction | 12.0% DEFAULT | 6.5% BENCHMARK | $45.6M | $1.3M | $46.9M | $0 | 12mo |
| A/R Days Reduction | 52.00 DEFAULT | 38.00 BENCHMARK | $7.3M | $21.6M | $28.8M | $90.9M | 9mo |
| Clean Claim Rate | 88.0% DEFAULT | 96.0% BENCHMARK | $0 | $1.5M | $1.5M | $0 | 6mo |
| Net Collection Rate | 93.5% DEFAULT | 35.1% BENCHMARK | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 18mo |
| CDI / Case Mix Index | 135.0% DEFAULT | 142.0% BENCHMARK | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 18mo |
Implementation Timing Curve
Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.
| Lever | M0 | M3 | M6 | M9 | M12 | M18 | M24 | M36 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost to Collect | $0 | $11.9M | $23.7M | $35.6M | $47.4M | $47.4M | $47.4M | $47.4M |
| Denial Rate Reduction | $0 | $11.7M | $23.5M | $35.2M | $46.9M | $46.9M | $46.9M | $46.9M |
| A/R Days Reduction | $0 | $9.6M | $19.2M | $28.8M | $28.8M | $28.8M | $28.8M | $28.8M |
| Clean Claim Rate | $0 | $759K | $1.5M | $1.5M | $1.5M | $1.5M | $1.5M | $1.5M |
| Cumulative | $0 | $34.0M | $67.9M | $101.1M | $124.7M | $124.7M | $124.7M | $124.7M |
Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)
5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $124.7M is added at exit.
| Entry \ Exit | 9.0x | 10.0x | 11.0x | 11.5x | 12.0x |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.0x | 111% / 41.7x | 116% / 46.7x | 120% / 51.7x | 122% / 54.2x | 124% / 56.7x |
| 9.0x | 106% / 36.7x | 110% / 41.2x | 115% / 45.6x | 117% / 47.8x | 119% / 50.0x |
| 10.0x | 101% / 32.7x | 106% / 36.7x | 110% / 40.7x | 112% / 42.7x | 114% / 44.7x |
| 11.0x | 97% / 29.4x | 101% / 33.1x | 106% / 36.7x | 108% / 38.5x | 109% / 40.4x |
| 12.0x | 93% / 26.7x | 98% / 30.1x | 102% / 33.4x | 104% / 35.0x | 106% / 36.7x |
Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)
Pro forma EBITDA can decline 78% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.4x, adding 7.0 turns of cushion.
5-Year Value Creation Waterfall
EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).
| Base EBITDA | RCM Uplift | Total | Margin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | $25.0M | — | $25.0M | 1.1% |
| Year 1 | $25.7M | +$83.1M | $108.9M | 4.6% |
| Year 2 | $26.5M | +$124.7M | $151.2M | 6.4% |
| Year 3 | $27.3M | +$124.7M | $152.0M | 6.4% |
| Year 4 | $28.1M | +$124.7M | $152.8M | 6.4% |
| Year 5 | $29.0M | +$124.7M | $153.7M | 6.5% |
Achievement Sensitivity
What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.
| Lever | 50% | 75% | 100% | 120% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost to Collect | $23.7M | $35.6M | $47.4M | $56.9M |
| Denial Rate Reductio | $23.5M | $35.2M | $46.9M | $56.3M |
| A/R Days Reduction | $14.4M | $21.6M | $28.8M | $34.6M |
| Clean Claim Rate | $759K | $1.1M | $1.5M | $1.8M |
| Total | $62.4M | $93.5M | $124.7M | $149.7M |
Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits
Key metrics vs 13 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.
| Metric | Hospital | P25 | P50 | P75 | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Op Margin | 1.1% | -1.3% | 1.7% | 14.7% | P33 |
| Net-to-Gross | 30.8% | 27.3% | 31.5% | 35.1% | P33 |
| Occupancy | 73.9% | 71.3% | 75.2% | 86.1% | P31 |
| Rev/Bed | $3.6M | $1.6M | $2.1M | $2.7M | P92 |
| Exp/Bed | $3.5M | $1.6M | $1.8M | $2.7M | P92 |
Bridge Methodology
Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.