Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — RUTLAND REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 08:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — RUTLAND REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 470005 | VT | 142 beds | Current EBITDA $-39.2M → Pro Forma $-23.1M (+$16.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$305.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-39.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$16.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-23.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$11.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$16.1M
Modeled Uplift
$11.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $11.3M (vs $16.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$195K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$16.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.1M$6.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.9M$168K$6.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$937K$2.8M$3.7M$11.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$195K$195K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT37.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.5M$3.1M$4.6M$6.1M$6.1M$6.1M$6.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.2M$2.5M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$98K$195K$195K$195K$195K$195K$195K
Cumulative$0$4.4M$8.7M$13.0M$16.1M$16.1M$16.1M$16.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $16.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-39.2M$-39.2M-12.8%
Year 1$-40.4M+$10.7M$-29.7M-9.7%
Year 2$-41.6M+$16.1M$-25.5M-8.4%
Year 3$-42.8M+$16.1M$-26.8M-8.8%
Year 4$-44.1M+$16.1M$-28.1M-9.2%
Year 5$-45.5M+$16.1M$-29.4M-9.6%
$-392.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$-323.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$68.8M
Value Created
$-29.4M
Exit EBITDA
$-62.4M
Organic Growth
$160.6M
RCM Value Creation
$-29.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.1M$4.6M$6.1M$7.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$7.3M
A/R Days Reduction$1.9M$2.8M$3.7M$4.5M
Clean Claim Rate$98K$147K$195K$235K
Total$8.0M$12.0M$16.1M$19.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 2070 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-12.8%-13.7%-3.3%7.1%
P27
Net-to-Gross43.7%19.5%27.5%37.6%
P83
Occupancy61.9%46.8%61.2%74.8%
P51
Rev/Bed$2.2M$516K$1.2M$1.7M
P86
Exp/Bed$2.4M$522K$1.2M$1.8M
P90

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML