Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 02:17 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 470003 | VT | 461 beds | Current EBITDA $-539.3M → Pro Forma $-470.4M (+$68.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.31B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-539.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$68.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-470.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$50.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$68.9M
Modeled Uplift
$50.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$18.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $50.2M (vs $68.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$26.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$25.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$15.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$838K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$68.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$26.2M$26.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$25.2M$720K$25.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$4.0M$11.9M$15.9M$50.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$838K$838K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$6.5M$13.1M$19.6M$26.2M$26.2M$26.2M$26.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$6.5M$13.0M$19.4M$25.9M$25.9M$25.9M$25.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$5.3M$10.6M$15.9M$15.9M$15.9M$15.9M$15.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$419K$838K$838K$838K$838K$838K$838K
Cumulative$0$18.8M$37.5M$55.8M$68.9M$68.9M$68.9M$68.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $68.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-539.3M$-539.3M-41.2%
Year 1$-555.5M+$45.9M$-509.6M-38.9%
Year 2$-572.1M+$68.9M$-503.3M-38.4%
Year 3$-589.3M+$68.9M$-520.4M-39.8%
Year 4$-607.0M+$68.9M$-538.1M-41.1%
Year 5$-625.2M+$68.9M$-556.3M-42.5%
$-5.39B
Entry EV (10x)
$-6.12B
Exit EV (11x)
$-726.6M
Value Created
$-556.3M
Exit EBITDA
$-859.0M
Organic Growth
$688.7M
RCM Value Creation
$-556.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$13.1M$19.6M$26.2M$31.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$13.0M$19.4M$25.9M$31.1M
A/R Days Reduction$8.0M$11.9M$15.9M$19.1M
Clean Claim Rate$419K$628K$838K$1.0M
Total$34.4M$51.7M$68.9M$82.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 1001 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-41.2%-13.4%-3.8%5.2%
P5
Net-to-Gross36.5%18.9%25.4%32.2%
P84
Occupancy81.7%61.0%71.6%79.5%
P79
Rev/Bed$2.8M$1.2M$1.6M$2.1M
P90
Exp/Bed$4.0M$1.1M$1.6M$2.2M
P96

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML