Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KPC PROMISE HOSPITAL OF SALT LAKE 2026-04-26 03:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KPC PROMISE HOSPITAL OF SALT LAKE
CCN 462004 | UT | 38 beds | Current EBITDA $1.9M → Pro Forma $2.8M (+$882K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$16.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$882K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$643K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$882K
Modeled Uplift
$602K
Risk-Adjusted
-$280K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$335K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$332K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$204K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$11K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$882K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$335K$335K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$323K$9K$332K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$51K$153K$204K$643K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$11K$11K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT65.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$84K$168K$252K$335K$335K$335K$335K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$83K$166K$249K$332K$332K$332K$332K
A/R Days Reduction$0$68K$136K$204K$204K$204K$204K$204K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K
Cumulative$0$240K$480K$715K$882K$882K$882K$882K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $882K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x54% / 8.7x58% / 10.0x62% / 11.3x64% / 12.0x66% / 12.7x
9.0x49% / 7.3x54% / 8.5x58% / 9.7x59% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x
10.0x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x
11.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x
12.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.7x
Headroom (turns)
12%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 12% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.8x, adding 2.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.9M$1.9M11.2%
Year 1$1.9M+$588K$2.5M15.0%
Year 2$2.0M+$882K$2.9M17.1%
Year 3$2.0M+$882K$2.9M17.5%
Year 4$2.1M+$882K$3.0M17.8%
Year 5$2.2M+$882K$3.1M18.2%
$18.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$33.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$14.9M
Value Created
$3.1M
Exit EBITDA
$3.0M
Organic Growth
$8.8M
RCM Value Creation
$3.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$168K$252K$335K$402K
Denial Rate Reductio$166K$249K$332K$398K
A/R Days Reduction$102K$153K$204K$245K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$8K$11K$13K
Total$441K$662K$882K$1.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 27 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin11.2%-12.7%4.3%14.1%
P63
Net-to-Gross46.4%38.7%45.2%65.9%
P56
Occupancy59.4%25.9%30.3%53.1%
P81
Rev/Bed$441K$525K$1.7M$2.5M
P19
Exp/Bed$392K$620K$1.4M$2.2M
P15

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML