Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — WESTERN PEAKS SPECIALTY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:18 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — WESTERN PEAKS SPECIALTY HOSPITAL
CCN 462003 | UT | 59 beds | Current EBITDA $-4.9M → Pro Forma $-3.2M (+$1.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$31.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-4.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-3.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$1.7M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$542K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$634K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$628K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$386K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$20K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$634K$634K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$611K$17K$628K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$97K$289K$386K$1.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$20K$20K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT46.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$159K$317K$476K$634K$634K$634K$634K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$157K$314K$471K$628K$628K$628K$628K
A/R Days Reduction$0$129K$257K$386K$386K$386K$386K$386K
Clean Claim Rate$0$10K$20K$20K$20K$20K$20K$20K
Cumulative$0$454K$909K$1.4M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-4.9M$-4.9M-15.4%
Year 1$-5.0M+$1.1M$-3.9M-12.4%
Year 2$-5.2M+$1.7M$-3.5M-11.1%
Year 3$-5.4M+$1.7M$-3.7M-11.6%
Year 4$-5.5M+$1.7M$-3.8M-12.1%
Year 5$-5.7M+$1.7M$-4.0M-12.6%
$-49.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$-44.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$4.9M
Value Created
$-4.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-7.8M
Organic Growth
$16.7M
RCM Value Creation
$-4.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$317K$476K$634K$761K
Denial Rate Reductio$314K$471K$628K$754K
A/R Days Reduction$193K$290K$386K$463K
Clean Claim Rate$10K$15K$20K$24K
Total$834K$1.3M$1.7M$2.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 25 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-15.4%-0.6%13.7%25.3%
P4
Net-to-Gross45.2%37.3%42.4%46.4%
P68
Occupancy56.1%30.3%43.0%56.8%
P64
Rev/Bed$538K$441K$1.7M$2.5M
P28
Exp/Bed$621K$392K$1.4M$1.9M
P28

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML