Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — OGDEN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 05:24 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — OGDEN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 460005 | UT | 174 beds | Current EBITDA $141.8M → Pro Forma $157.5M (+$15.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$299.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$141.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$15.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$157.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$11.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$15.7M
Modeled Uplift
$10.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.0M
Execution Discount
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Risks: Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $10.7M (vs $15.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$192K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$15.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.0M$6.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.8M$165K$5.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$918K$2.7M$3.6M$11.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$192K$192K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT41.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.4M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$96K$192K$192K$192K$192K$192K$192K
Cumulative$0$4.3M$8.6M$12.8M$15.7M$15.7M$15.7M$15.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $15.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.1x
9.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x
10.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.7x
11.0x29% / 3.5x34% / 4.3x38% / 5.0x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x
12.0x24% / 3.0x29% / 3.6x34% / 4.3x36% / 4.7x38% / 5.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
-1.1x
Headroom (turns)
-17%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -17% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.6x, adding 0.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$141.8M$141.8M47.4%
Year 1$146.0M+$10.5M$156.5M52.3%
Year 2$150.4M+$15.7M$166.2M55.5%
Year 3$154.9M+$15.7M$170.7M57.0%
Year 4$159.6M+$15.7M$175.3M58.6%
Year 5$164.4M+$15.7M$180.1M60.2%
$1.42B
Entry EV (10x)
$1.98B
Exit EV (11x)
$563.4M
Value Created
$180.1M
Exit EBITDA
$225.8M
Organic Growth
$157.5M
RCM Value Creation
$180.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$7.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.0M$4.4M$5.9M$7.1M
A/R Days Reduction$1.8M$2.7M$3.6M$4.4M
Clean Claim Rate$96K$144K$192K$230K
Total$7.9M$11.8M$15.7M$18.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 17 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin47.4%7.1%17.6%30.3%
P94
Net-to-Gross21.7%31.3%37.9%41.7%
P6
Occupancy54.3%39.7%56.3%64.7%
P41
Rev/Bed$1.7M$1.3M$1.9M$2.5M
P44
Exp/Bed$905K$823K$1.1M$1.9M
P35

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML