Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MCKAY-DEE HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 04:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MCKAY-DEE HOSPITAL
CCN 460004 | UT | 236 beds | Current EBITDA $79.4M → Pro Forma $112.6M (+$33.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$629.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$79.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$33.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$112.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$24.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$33.1M
Modeled Uplift
$23.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$9.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $23.4M (vs $33.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$12.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$12.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$7.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$403K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$33.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$12.6M$12.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$12.1M$346K$12.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.9M$5.7M$7.7M$24.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$403K$403K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT40.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.1M$6.3M$9.4M$12.6M$12.6M$12.6M$12.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.1M$6.2M$9.4M$12.5M$12.5M$12.5M$12.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.6M$5.1M$7.7M$7.7M$7.7M$7.7M$7.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$202K$403K$403K$403K$403K$403K$403K
Cumulative$0$9.0M$18.0M$26.9M$33.1M$33.1M$33.1M$33.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $33.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.6x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.5x65% / 12.1x
9.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x
10.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.0x54% / 8.5x55% / 9.1x
11.0x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x49% / 7.5x51% / 7.9x
12.0x35% / 4.4x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.5x
Headroom (turns)
8%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 8% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.0x, adding 2.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$79.4M$79.4M12.6%
Year 1$81.8M+$22.1M$103.9M16.5%
Year 2$84.3M+$33.1M$117.4M18.6%
Year 3$86.8M+$33.1M$120.0M19.0%
Year 4$89.4M+$33.1M$122.6M19.5%
Year 5$92.1M+$33.1M$125.2M19.9%
$794.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.38B
Exit EV (11x)
$583.2M
Value Created
$125.2M
Exit EBITDA
$126.5M
Organic Growth
$331.4M
RCM Value Creation
$125.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$6.3M$9.4M$12.6M$15.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$6.2M$9.4M$12.5M$15.0M
A/R Days Reduction$3.8M$5.7M$7.7M$9.2M
Clean Claim Rate$202K$302K$403K$484K
Total$16.6M$24.9M$33.1M$39.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 12 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin12.6%6.6%12.6%31.2%
P45
Net-to-Gross36.0%28.7%37.1%40.3%
P36
Occupancy64.7%38.4%56.6%67.6%
P58
Rev/Bed$2.7M$1.2M$1.7M$2.4M
P73
Exp/Bed$2.3M$746K$1.1M$2.0M
P75

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML