Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BEHAVIORAL HOSPITAL OF BELLAIRE 2026-04-26 18:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BEHAVIORAL HOSPITAL OF BELLAIRE
CCN 454107 | TX | 122 beds | Current EBITDA $2.1M → Pro Forma $3.6M (+$1.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$27.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$1.5M
Modeled Uplift
$1.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$424K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$553K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$547K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$336K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$18K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$553K$553K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$532K$15K$547K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$85K$251K$336K$1.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$18K$18K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$138K$276K$415K$553K$553K$553K$553K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$137K$274K$410K$547K$547K$547K$547K
A/R Days Reduction$0$112K$224K$336K$336K$336K$336K$336K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K
Cumulative$0$396K$792K$1.2M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x59% / 10.3x64% / 11.8x68% / 13.3x70% / 14.1x71% / 14.8x
9.0x54% / 8.8x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.5x65% / 12.1x67% / 12.8x
10.0x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.8x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x
11.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x
12.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x54% / 8.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.5x
Headroom (turns)
23%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 23% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.0x, adding 3.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.1M$2.1M7.6%
Year 1$2.2M+$969K$3.1M11.3%
Year 2$2.2M+$1.5M$3.7M13.3%
Year 3$2.3M+$1.5M$3.7M13.6%
Year 4$2.4M+$1.5M$3.8M13.8%
Year 5$2.4M+$1.5M$3.9M14.1%
$21.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$42.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$21.8M
Value Created
$3.9M
Exit EBITDA
$3.3M
Organic Growth
$14.5M
RCM Value Creation
$3.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$276K$415K$553K$663K
Denial Rate Reductio$274K$410K$547K$657K
A/R Days Reduction$168K$252K$336K$404K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$13K$18K$21K
Total$727K$1.1M$1.5M$1.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 174 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.6%-9.3%2.2%12.0%
P62
Net-to-Gross36.3%15.9%23.9%34.7%
P79
Occupancy78.0%46.5%61.7%75.3%
P80
Rev/Bed$227K$304K$772K$1.3M
P18
Exp/Bed$209K$327K$758K$1.3M
P13

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML