Investability Score
Hold / Selective β investigate specific opportunities but be prepared for execution risk.
54
/ 100 (C)
Financial Health12/25
RCM Upside10/25
Market Position15/20
Demand Defensibility9/15
Operational Efficiency7/15
Entry Multiple: 8.0x β 10.0x
Est. MOIC: 1.9x
Risk Factors:
Catalysts:
- Strong commercial payer base protects revenue
- Limited competition supports pricing power
Margin Prediction (Trained Ridge Model)
-4.2%
RΒ²=0.34 | n=4,907 | Grade B | Actual: 7.6%
Ridge regression trained on 4,907 HCRIS hospitals. 90% CI: [-32.5%, 24.1%]. P51 nationally.
| Driver | Value | Effect | Explanation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue/Bed | 226515.016 | -0.1888 | Lower Revenue/Bed decreases predicted margin | |
| Expense/Bed | 209319.123 | +0.1784 | Higher Expense/Bed increases predicted margin | |
| Reimbursement Quality | 0.324 | -0.0353 | Higher Reimbursement Quality decreases predicted m | |
| State Peer Margin | -0.006 | +0.0290 | Higher State Peer Margin increases predicted margi | |
| Bed Utilization Value | 176664.418 | -0.0231 | Lower Bed Utilization Value decreases predicted ma |
Suburban Community Hospit
Archetype
42.2%
Distress Risk
$0
RCM Opportunity
D
Opportunity Grade
7.6%
Projected Margin
Cluster: Suburban Community Hospital
Percentile within cluster: P64. Community hospitals β the largest PE deal category. Focus on RCM improvement and cost optimization at 9-11x.
Nearest Peers
| Hospital | State | Beds |
|---|---|---|
| CLARA MAASS MEDICAL CENTER | NJ | 259 |
| PRESENCE SAINTS MARY & ELIZABETH MED | IL | 266 |
| ADVENTIST HEALTH BAKERSFIELD | CA | 254 |
| BRISTOL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER | TN | 244 |
| HOLSTON VALLEY HOSP & MED CTR | TN | 286 |
| SPRINGFIELD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER | OH | 230 |
Distress Analysis
Risk: Elevated
National distress rate: 49.3%
TX distress rate: 42.8%
Model AUC: 0.629
| Factor | Value | Contribution | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Occupancy Rate | 0.780 | -0.236 | ▼ risk |
| Medicaid Day Pct | 0.002 | -0.087 | ▼ risk |
| Revenue Per Bed | 226515.016 | +0.080 | ▲ risk |
| Medicare Day Pct | 0.106 | -0.038 | ▼ risk |
| Beds | 122.000 | -0.004 | ▼ risk |
| Net To Gross Ratio | 0.363 | -0.002 | ▼ risk |
RCM Improvement Opportunity
Total (risk-adjusted): $0
Current margin: 7.6%
Projected margin: 7.6%
Grade: D
Comps: 173
Gap analysis vs P75 peers with 60% closure assumption. Confidence-weighted by lever implementation difficulty.
| Lever | Current | Benchmark | Gap | Impact | Confidence | Timeline |
|---|
Predicted RCM Performance (Public Data Only)
A
RCM Grade
Strong RCM profile β likely low-risk from an operations perspective. Focus diligence on growth thesis.
| Metric | Predicted | 90% CI | Percentile | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denial Rate | 2.0% | [2.0%, 25.0%] | P0 | Strong β predicted denial rate is in the top third nationall |
| Days in AR | 25.0 | [25.0, 75.0] | P0 | Strong β predicted days in ar is in the top third nationally |
| Clean Claim Rate | 98.0% | [80.0%, 98.0%] | P0 | Strong β predicted clean claim rate is in the top third. |
| Net Collection Rate | 99.5% | [90.0%, 99.5%] | P8 | Strong β predicted net collection rate is in the top third. |