Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — AUSTIN STATE HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 17:19 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — AUSTIN STATE HOSPITAL
CCN 454084 | TX | 268 beds | Current EBITDA $-22.6M → Pro Forma $-20.0M (+$2.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$50.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-22.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-20.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$2.6M
Modeled Uplift
$1.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$910K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.7M (vs $2.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$994K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$611K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$32K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.0M$1.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$966K$28K$994K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$154K$457K$611K$1.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$32K$32K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT25.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$251K$502K$753K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$248K$497K$745K$994K$994K$994K$994K
A/R Days Reduction$0$204K$407K$611K$611K$611K$611K$611K
Clean Claim Rate$0$16K$32K$32K$32K$32K$32K$32K
Cumulative$0$719K$1.4M$2.1M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-22.6M$-22.6M-45.1%
Year 1$-23.3M+$1.8M$-21.5M-42.9%
Year 2$-24.0M+$2.6M$-21.4M-42.6%
Year 3$-24.7M+$2.6M$-22.1M-44.0%
Year 4$-25.5M+$2.6M$-22.8M-45.5%
Year 5$-26.2M+$2.6M$-23.6M-47.0%
$-226.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$-259.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$-33.2M
Value Created
$-23.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-36.0M
Organic Growth
$26.4M
RCM Value Creation
$-23.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$502K$753K$1.0M$1.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$497K$745K$994K$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$305K$458K$611K$733K
Clean Claim Rate$16K$24K$32K$39K
Total$1.3M$2.0M$2.6M$3.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 137 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-45.1%-7.8%4.9%14.7%
P8
Net-to-Gross50.9%12.7%18.2%25.6%
P96
Occupancy61.3%54.7%67.2%75.6%
P35
Rev/Bed$187K$691K$1.2M$1.5M
P6
Exp/Bed$272K$705K$1.1M$1.5M
P9

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML