Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER OF DALLAS 2026-04-26 05:19 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER OF DALLAS
CCN 453302 | TX | 377 beds | Current EBITDA $160.3M → Pro Forma $242.2M (+$82.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.56B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$160.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$82.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$242.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$59.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$82.0M
Modeled Uplift
$58.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$23.2M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $58.8M (vs $82.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$31.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$30.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$19.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$997K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$82.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$31.2M$31.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$30.0M$857K$30.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$4.8M$14.2M$19.0M$59.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$997K$997K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT25.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$7.8M$15.6M$23.4M$31.2M$31.2M$31.2M$31.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$7.7M$15.4M$23.1M$30.9M$30.9M$30.9M$30.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$6.3M$12.6M$19.0M$19.0M$19.0M$19.0M$19.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$499K$997K$997K$997K$997K$997K$997K
Cumulative$0$22.3M$44.7M$66.5M$82.0M$82.0M$82.0M$82.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $82.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x55% / 9.0x60% / 10.3x64% / 11.7x65% / 12.4x67% / 13.0x
9.0x50% / 7.6x55% / 8.8x59% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x
10.0x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x
11.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
12.0x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.9x
Headroom (turns)
14%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 14% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.6x, adding 2.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$160.3M$160.3M10.3%
Year 1$165.1M+$54.7M$219.7M14.1%
Year 2$170.0M+$82.0M$252.0M16.2%
Year 3$175.1M+$82.0M$257.1M16.5%
Year 4$180.4M+$82.0M$262.4M16.8%
Year 5$185.8M+$82.0M$267.8M17.2%
$1.60B
Entry EV (10x)
$2.95B
Exit EV (11x)
$1.34B
Value Created
$267.8M
Exit EBITDA
$255.3M
Organic Growth
$819.9M
RCM Value Creation
$267.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$15.6M$23.4M$31.2M$37.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$15.4M$23.1M$30.9M$37.0M
A/R Days Reduction$9.5M$14.2M$19.0M$22.8M
Clean Claim Rate$499K$748K$997K$1.2M
Total$41.0M$61.5M$82.0M$98.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 105 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin10.3%-8.3%4.1%14.6%
P61
Net-to-Gross43.4%13.4%18.3%25.2%
P91
Occupancy67.6%61.3%69.4%78.1%
P43
Rev/Bed$4.1M$1.0M$1.3M$1.6M
P98
Exp/Bed$3.7M$895K$1.2M$1.6M
P97

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML