Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CHRISTUS ST MICHAEL REHAB HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:07 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CHRISTUS ST MICHAEL REHAB HOSPITAL
CCN 453065 | TX | 50 beds | Current EBITDA $978K → Pro Forma $2.3M (+$1.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$24.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$978K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$935K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$1.3M
Modeled Uplift
$887K
Risk-Adjusted
-$395K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.9M (vs $1.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$487K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$483K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$297K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$16K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$487K$487K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$469K$13K$483K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$75K$222K$297K$935K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$16K$16K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$122K$244K$366K$487K$487K$487K$487K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$121K$241K$362K$483K$483K$483K$483K
A/R Days Reduction$0$99K$198K$297K$297K$297K$297K$297K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K
Cumulative$0$349K$698K$1.0M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x71% / 14.8x76% / 16.8x80% / 18.8x82% / 19.8x84% / 20.8x
9.0x67% / 12.8x71% / 14.6x75% / 16.4x77% / 17.3x79% / 18.2x
10.0x62% / 11.2x67% / 12.8x71% / 14.4x72% / 15.2x74% / 16.0x
11.0x58% / 9.9x63% / 11.3x67% / 12.8x68% / 13.5x70% / 14.3x
12.0x54% / 8.8x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.5x65% / 12.1x67% / 12.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.8x
Headroom (turns)
44%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 44% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.7x, adding 4.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$978K$978K4.0%
Year 1$1.0M+$855K$1.9M7.6%
Year 2$1.0M+$1.3M$2.3M9.5%
Year 3$1.1M+$1.3M$2.4M9.6%
Year 4$1.1M+$1.3M$2.4M9.8%
Year 5$1.1M+$1.3M$2.4M9.9%
$9.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$26.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$16.8M
Value Created
$2.4M
Exit EBITDA
$1.6M
Organic Growth
$12.8M
RCM Value Creation
$2.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$244K$366K$487K$585K
Denial Rate Reductio$241K$362K$483K$579K
A/R Days Reduction$148K$222K$297K$356K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$12K$16K$19K
Total$641K$962K$1.3M$1.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 276 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.0%-21.0%-3.2%10.7%
P64
Net-to-Gross27.7%23.0%32.9%51.0%
P38
Occupancy54.6%23.5%50.8%71.3%
P54
Rev/Bed$487K$335K$562K$1.1M
P42
Exp/Bed$468K$371K$537K$1.2M
P41

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML