Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CORNERSTONE SPECIALTY AUSTIN 2026-04-26 09:53 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CORNERSTONE SPECIALTY AUSTIN
CCN 452034 | TX | 145 beds | Current EBITDA $6.4M → Pro Forma $9.3M (+$2.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$54.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$6.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$9.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$2.9M
Modeled Uplift
$1.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$998K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.9M (vs $2.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$664K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$35K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.1M$1.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.1M$30K$1.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$167K$496K$664K$2.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$35K$35K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$273K$545K$818K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$270K$540K$810K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$221K$443K$664K$664K$664K$664K$664K
Clean Claim Rate$0$17K$35K$35K$35K$35K$35K$35K
Cumulative$0$781K$1.6M$2.3M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x53% / 8.5x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.4x
9.0x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x
10.0x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
11.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x
12.0x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.5x45% / 6.3x47% / 6.8x48% / 7.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.7x
Headroom (turns)
10%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 10% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.8x, adding 2.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$6.4M$6.4M11.7%
Year 1$6.6M+$1.9M$8.5M15.6%
Year 2$6.8M+$2.9M$9.7M17.7%
Year 3$7.0M+$2.9M$9.9M18.1%
Year 4$7.2M+$2.9M$10.1M18.5%
Year 5$7.4M+$2.9M$10.3M18.9%
$64.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$113.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$49.2M
Value Created
$10.3M
Exit EBITDA
$10.2M
Organic Growth
$28.7M
RCM Value Creation
$10.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$545K$818K$1.1M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$540K$810K$1.1M$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction$332K$498K$664K$797K
Clean Claim Rate$17K$26K$35K$42K
Total$1.4M$2.2M$2.9M$3.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 166 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin11.7%-8.5%2.5%13.3%
P71
Net-to-Gross18.9%14.8%22.6%32.3%
P39
Occupancy47.7%47.2%62.5%74.7%
P26
Rev/Bed$376K$341K$929K$1.4M
P27
Exp/Bed$332K$382K$888K$1.3M
P22

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML