Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KINDRED HOSPITAL HOUSTON 2026-04-26 14:31 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KINDRED HOSPITAL HOUSTON
CCN 452023 | TX | 97 beds | Current EBITDA $-491K → Pro Forma $2.4M (+$2.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$54.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-491K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$2.8M
Modeled Uplift
$1.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$939K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.9M (vs $2.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$658K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$35K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.1M$1.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.0M$30K$1.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$166K$492K$658K$2.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$35K$35K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT37.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$270K$541K$811K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$268K$536K$803K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$219K$439K$658K$658K$658K$658K$658K
Clean Claim Rate$0$17K$35K$35K$35K$35K$35K$35K
Cumulative$0$775K$1.5M$2.3M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-1.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
8.3x
Headroom (turns)
127%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 127% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -1.8x, adding 100.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-491K$-491K-0.9%
Year 1$-506K+$1.9M$1.4M2.6%
Year 2$-521K+$2.8M$2.3M4.3%
Year 3$-537K+$2.8M$2.3M4.3%
Year 4$-553K+$2.8M$2.3M4.2%
Year 5$-569K+$2.8M$2.3M4.2%
$-4.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$25.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$30.0M
Value Created
$2.3M
Exit EBITDA
$-782K
Organic Growth
$28.5M
RCM Value Creation
$2.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$541K$811K$1.1M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$536K$803K$1.1M$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction$329K$494K$658K$790K
Clean Claim Rate$17K$26K$35K$42K
Total$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$3.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 191 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-0.9%-10.3%2.7%12.7%
P41
Net-to-Gross17.6%16.4%26.4%37.4%
P32
Occupancy53.5%44.5%58.6%75.0%
P39
Rev/Bed$558K$286K$568K$1.2M
P49
Exp/Bed$563K$306K$506K$1.2M
P52

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML