Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HILL REGIONAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:09 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HILL REGIONAL HOSPITAL
CCN 451395 | TX | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $2.9M → Pro Forma $4.8M (+$1.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$36.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$1.9M
Modeled Uplift
$1.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$607K
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.3M (vs $1.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$726K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$719K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$442K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$23K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$726K$726K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$699K$20K$719K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$111K$330K$442K$1.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$23K$23K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT53.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$182K$363K$545K$726K$726K$726K$726K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$180K$359K$539K$719K$719K$719K$719K
A/R Days Reduction$0$147K$295K$442K$442K$442K$442K$442K
Clean Claim Rate$0$12K$23K$23K$23K$23K$23K$23K
Cumulative$0$520K$1.0M$1.5M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.6x67% / 13.0x69% / 13.8x71% / 14.5x
9.0x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.9x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.5x
10.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x61% / 11.0x
11.0x45% / 6.4x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.7x
12.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.4x
Headroom (turns)
22%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 22% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.1x, adding 3.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.9M$2.9M7.9%
Year 1$3.0M+$1.3M$4.2M11.7%
Year 2$3.1M+$1.9M$5.0M13.7%
Year 3$3.1M+$1.9M$5.1M13.9%
Year 4$3.2M+$1.9M$5.2M14.2%
Year 5$3.3M+$1.9M$5.2M14.5%
$28.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$57.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$28.9M
Value Created
$5.2M
Exit EBITDA
$4.6M
Organic Growth
$19.1M
RCM Value Creation
$5.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$363K$545K$726K$871K
Denial Rate Reductio$359K$539K$719K$863K
A/R Days Reduction$221K$331K$442K$530K
Clean Claim Rate$12K$17K$23K$28K
Total$955K$1.4M$1.9M$2.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 257 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.9%-36.7%-7.9%9.6%
P72
Net-to-Gross20.7%25.0%36.3%53.9%
P14
Occupancy51.1%13.2%30.0%56.2%
P69
Rev/Bed$1.5M$436K$654K$1.3M
P80
Exp/Bed$1.3M$458K$834K$1.4M
P72

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML