Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY AT PRES 2026-04-26 17:17 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY AT PRES
CCN 450889 | TX | 9 beds | Current EBITDA $18.8M → Pro Forma $22.9M (+$4.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$76.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$18.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$22.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$4.0M
Modeled Uplift
$2.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.1M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.9M (vs $4.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$931K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$49K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.5M$1.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.5M$42K$1.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$235K$696K$931K$2.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$49K$49K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT67.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$382K$765K$1.1M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$379K$757K$1.1M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$310K$620K$931K$931K$931K$931K$931K
Clean Claim Rate$0$24K$49K$49K$49K$49K$49K$49K
Cumulative$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.3M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.1x
9.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x
10.0x37% / 4.8x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x49% / 7.5x
11.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.7x43% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x
12.0x28% / 3.5x33% / 4.2x38% / 4.9x40% / 5.3x42% / 5.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.5x
Headroom (turns)
-7%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -7% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.0x, adding 1.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$18.8M$18.8M24.6%
Year 1$19.4M+$2.7M$22.1M28.9%
Year 2$20.0M+$4.0M$24.0M31.4%
Year 3$20.6M+$4.0M$24.6M32.2%
Year 4$21.2M+$4.0M$25.2M33.0%
Year 5$21.8M+$4.0M$25.9M33.8%
$188.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$284.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$96.1M
Value Created
$25.9M
Exit EBITDA
$30.0M
Organic Growth
$40.2M
RCM Value Creation
$25.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$765K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$757K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
A/R Days Reduction$465K$698K$931K$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$24K$37K$49K$59K
Total$2.0M$3.0M$4.0M$4.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 50 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin24.6%-50.0%-32.6%8.0%
P92
Net-to-Gross41.4%24.0%45.2%67.9%
P43
Occupancy20.7%9.7%15.3%26.2%
P64
Rev/Bed$8.5M$485K$790K$1.6M
P100
Exp/Bed$6.4M$711K$1.1M$1.9M
P100

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML