Bridge Realization Estimate
ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)
Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $9.8M (vs $13.4M modeled).
EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers
Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).
Lever Detail
Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.
| Lever | Current | Target | Revenue | Cost | EBITDA | WC | Ramp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost to Collect | 4.5% DEFAULT | 2.5% BENCHMARK | $0 | $5.1M | $5.1M | $0 | 12mo |
| Denial Rate Reduction | 12.0% DEFAULT | 6.5% BENCHMARK | $4.9M | $140K | $5.0M | $0 | 12mo |
| A/R Days Reduction | 52.00 DEFAULT | 38.00 BENCHMARK | $782K | $2.3M | $3.1M | $9.8M | 9mo |
| Clean Claim Rate | 88.0% DEFAULT | 96.0% BENCHMARK | $0 | $163K | $163K | $0 | 6mo |
| Net Collection Rate | 93.5% DEFAULT | 51.0% BENCHMARK | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 18mo |
| CDI / Case Mix Index | 135.0% DEFAULT | 142.0% BENCHMARK | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 18mo |
Implementation Timing Curve
Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.
| Lever | M0 | M3 | M6 | M9 | M12 | M18 | M24 | M36 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost to Collect | $0 | $1.3M | $2.6M | $3.8M | $5.1M | $5.1M | $5.1M | $5.1M |
| Denial Rate Reduction | $0 | $1.3M | $2.5M | $3.8M | $5.0M | $5.0M | $5.0M | $5.0M |
| A/R Days Reduction | $0 | $1.0M | $2.1M | $3.1M | $3.1M | $3.1M | $3.1M | $3.1M |
| Clean Claim Rate | $0 | $82K | $163K | $163K | $163K | $163K | $163K | $163K |
| Cumulative | $0 | $3.7M | $7.3M | $10.9M | $13.4M | $13.4M | $13.4M | $13.4M |
Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)
5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $13.4M is added at exit.
| Entry \ Exit | 9.0x | 10.0x | 11.0x | 11.5x | 12.0x |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.0x | 45% / 6.5x | 50% / 7.6x | 54% / 8.7x | 56% / 9.2x | 58% / 9.8x |
| 9.0x | 40% / 5.4x | 45% / 6.4x | 49% / 7.3x | 51% / 7.8x | 53% / 8.3x |
| 10.0x | 35% / 4.6x | 40% / 5.4x | 44% / 6.3x | 46% / 6.7x | 48% / 7.2x |
| 11.0x | 31% / 3.9x | 36% / 4.6x | 40% / 5.4x | 42% / 5.8x | 44% / 6.2x |
| 12.0x | 27% / 3.3x | 32% / 4.0x | 36% / 4.7x | 38% / 5.1x | 40% / 5.4x |
Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)
Pro forma EBITDA can decline -11% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.2x, adding 1.3 turns of cushion.
5-Year Value Creation Waterfall
EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).
| Base EBITDA | RCM Uplift | Total | Margin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | $76.6M | — | $76.6M | 30.0% |
| Year 1 | $78.9M | +$8.9M | $87.8M | 34.4% |
| Year 2 | $81.3M | +$13.4M | $94.7M | 37.1% |
| Year 3 | $83.7M | +$13.4M | $97.1M | 38.1% |
| Year 4 | $86.2M | +$13.4M | $99.6M | 39.1% |
| Year 5 | $88.8M | +$13.4M | $102.2M | 40.1% |
Achievement Sensitivity
What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.
| Lever | 50% | 75% | 100% | 120% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost to Collect | $2.6M | $3.8M | $5.1M | $6.1M |
| Denial Rate Reductio | $2.5M | $3.8M | $5.0M | $6.1M |
| A/R Days Reduction | $1.6M | $2.3M | $3.1M | $3.7M |
| Clean Claim Rate | $82K | $122K | $163K | $196K |
| Total | $6.7M | $10.1M | $13.4M | $16.1M |
Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits
Key metrics vs 227 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.
| Metric | Hospital | P25 | P50 | P75 | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Op Margin | 30.0% | -14.4% | 0.1% | 12.1% | P96 |
| Net-to-Gross | 24.4% | 21.3% | 31.3% | 51.0% | P31 |
| Occupancy | 51.3% | 31.0% | 56.1% | 74.0% | P42 |
| Rev/Bed | $4.8M | $327K | $529K | $1.0M | P98 |
| Exp/Bed | $3.4M | $333K | $494K | $1.1M | P97 |
Bridge Methodology
Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.