Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — WOMANS HOSPITAL OF TEXAS 2026-04-26 04:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — WOMANS HOSPITAL OF TEXAS
CCN 450674 | TX | 252 beds | Current EBITDA $295.5M → Pro Forma $318.4M (+$22.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$435.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$295.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$22.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$318.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$16.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

77%
Realization (B)
$22.9M
Modeled Uplift
$17.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 77% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $17.6M (vs $22.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$8.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$8.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$279K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$22.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$8.7M$8.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$8.4M$239K$8.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.3M$4.0M$5.3M$16.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$279K$279K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT26.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.2M$4.4M$6.5M$8.7M$8.7M$8.7M$8.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.2M$4.3M$6.5M$8.6M$8.6M$8.6M$8.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.8M$3.5M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$139K$279K$279K$279K$279K$279K$279K
Cumulative$0$6.2M$12.5M$18.6M$22.9M$22.9M$22.9M$22.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $22.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x
9.0x37% / 4.8x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x50% / 7.5x
10.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x
11.0x27% / 3.3x32% / 4.1x37% / 4.8x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.5x
12.0x23% / 2.8x28% / 3.5x33% / 4.1x35% / 4.5x37% / 4.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
-1.4x
Headroom (turns)
-21%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -21% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.9x, adding 0.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$295.5M$295.5M67.9%
Year 1$304.4M+$15.3M$319.7M73.4%
Year 2$313.5M+$22.9M$336.4M77.3%
Year 3$322.9M+$22.9M$345.8M79.4%
Year 4$332.6M+$22.9M$355.5M81.7%
Year 5$342.6M+$22.9M$365.5M84.0%
$2.96B
Entry EV (10x)
$4.02B
Exit EV (11x)
$1.07B
Value Created
$365.5M
Exit EBITDA
$470.7M
Organic Growth
$229.0M
RCM Value Creation
$365.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.4M$6.5M$8.7M$10.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.3M$6.5M$8.6M$10.3M
A/R Days Reduction$2.6M$4.0M$5.3M$6.4M
Clean Claim Rate$139K$209K$279K$334K
Total$11.5M$17.2M$22.9M$27.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 135 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin67.9%-7.3%4.9%14.3%
P99
Net-to-Gross17.0%13.3%18.6%26.0%
P39
Occupancy99.2%53.2%66.6%75.7%
P97
Rev/Bed$1.7M$670K$1.2M$1.5M
P82
Exp/Bed$555K$693K$1.1M$1.5M
P19

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML