Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. DAVIDS MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 06:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. DAVIDS MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 450431 | TX | 525 beds | Current EBITDA $229.6M → Pro Forma $275.4M (+$45.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$870.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$229.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$45.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$275.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$33.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$45.8M
Modeled Uplift
$31.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$14.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $31.3M (vs $45.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$17.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$17.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$10.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$557K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$45.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$17.4M$17.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$16.8M$479K$17.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.7M$7.9M$10.6M$33.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$557K$557K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT25.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$4.4M$8.7M$13.1M$17.4M$17.4M$17.4M$17.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$4.3M$8.6M$12.9M$17.2M$17.2M$17.2M$17.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$3.5M$7.1M$10.6M$10.6M$10.6M$10.6M$10.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$279K$557K$557K$557K$557K$557K$557K
Cumulative$0$12.5M$25.0M$37.2M$45.8M$45.8M$45.8M$45.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $45.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.4x58% / 10.0x
9.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x54% / 8.5x
10.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.3x
11.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x
12.0x28% / 3.4x33% / 4.1x37% / 4.8x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.6x
Headroom (turns)
-9%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -9% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.1x, adding 1.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$229.6M$229.6M26.4%
Year 1$236.5M+$30.5M$267.1M30.7%
Year 2$243.6M+$45.8M$289.4M33.2%
Year 3$250.9M+$45.8M$296.7M34.1%
Year 4$258.4M+$45.8M$304.3M34.9%
Year 5$266.2M+$45.8M$312.0M35.8%
$2.30B
Entry EV (10x)
$3.43B
Exit EV (11x)
$1.14B
Value Created
$312.0M
Exit EBITDA
$365.7M
Organic Growth
$458.2M
RCM Value Creation
$312.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$8.7M$13.1M$17.4M$20.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$8.6M$12.9M$17.2M$20.7M
A/R Days Reduction$5.3M$7.9M$10.6M$12.7M
Clean Claim Rate$279K$418K$557K$669K
Total$22.9M$34.4M$45.8M$55.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 72 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin26.4%-18.7%4.3%13.1%
P90
Net-to-Gross14.0%12.4%18.1%25.4%
P33
Occupancy70.2%64.0%69.9%79.1%
P50
Rev/Bed$1.7M$1.1M$1.3M$1.6M
P75
Exp/Bed$1.2M$887K$1.3M$1.8M
P47

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML