Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BAYLOR SW MEDICAL CENTER- WAXAHACHIE 2026-04-26 21:55 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BAYLOR SW MEDICAL CENTER- WAXAHACHIE
CCN 450372 | TX | 123 beds | Current EBITDA $43.5M → Pro Forma $57.9M (+$14.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$273.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$43.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$14.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$57.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$10.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$14.4M
Modeled Uplift
$10.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 76% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $10.9M (vs $14.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$175K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$14.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.5M$5.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.3M$150K$5.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$839K$2.5M$3.3M$10.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$175K$175K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.4M$2.7M$4.1M$5.5M$5.5M$5.5M$5.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.4M$2.7M$4.1M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$88K$175K$175K$175K$175K$175K$175K
Cumulative$0$3.9M$7.8M$11.7M$14.4M$14.4M$14.4M$14.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $14.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x50% / 7.7x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x62% / 11.3x
9.0x45% / 6.4x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.7x
10.0x40% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x
11.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.3x
12.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.1x
Headroom (turns)
2%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 2% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.4x, adding 2.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$43.5M$43.5M15.9%
Year 1$44.8M+$9.6M$54.4M19.9%
Year 2$46.2M+$14.4M$60.6M22.1%
Year 3$47.6M+$14.4M$62.0M22.6%
Year 4$49.0M+$14.4M$63.4M23.2%
Year 5$50.5M+$14.4M$64.9M23.7%
$435.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$713.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$278.1M
Value Created
$64.9M
Exit EBITDA
$69.3M
Organic Growth
$143.9M
RCM Value Creation
$64.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.7M$4.1M$5.5M$6.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.7M$4.1M$5.4M$6.5M
A/R Days Reduction$1.7M$2.5M$3.3M$4.0M
Clean Claim Rate$88K$131K$175K$210K
Total$7.2M$10.8M$14.4M$17.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 171 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin15.9%-9.2%2.2%11.9%
P82
Net-to-Gross27.5%15.9%23.8%34.5%
P60
Occupancy86.7%46.6%62.0%75.3%
P92
Rev/Bed$2.2M$307K$820K$1.3M
P95
Exp/Bed$1.9M$329K$760K$1.3M
P92

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML