Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — TX HLTH HARRIS METHODIST HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:53 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — TX HLTH HARRIS METHODIST HOSPITAL
CCN 450135 | TX | 653 beds | Current EBITDA $42.5M → Pro Forma $96.4M (+$53.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.03B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$42.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$53.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$96.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$39.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$53.9M
Modeled Uplift
$38.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$15.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $38.9M (vs $53.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$20.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$20.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$12.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$656K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$53.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$20.5M$20.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$19.7M$564K$20.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$3.1M$9.3M$12.5M$39.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$656K$656K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT25.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$5.1M$10.3M$15.4M$20.5M$20.5M$20.5M$20.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$5.1M$10.2M$15.2M$20.3M$20.3M$20.3M$20.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$4.2M$8.3M$12.5M$12.5M$12.5M$12.5M$12.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$328K$656K$656K$656K$656K$656K$656K
Cumulative$0$14.7M$29.4M$43.7M$53.9M$53.9M$53.9M$53.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $53.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x71% / 14.5x75% / 16.5x79% / 18.5x81% / 19.4x83% / 20.4x
9.0x66% / 12.5x70% / 14.3x74% / 16.1x76% / 16.9x78% / 17.8x
10.0x61% / 11.0x66% / 12.5x70% / 14.1x72% / 14.9x73% / 15.7x
11.0x57% / 9.7x62% / 11.1x66% / 12.5x68% / 13.3x69% / 14.0x
12.0x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.9x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.8x
Headroom (turns)
43%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 43% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.7x, adding 4.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$42.5M$42.5M4.1%
Year 1$43.8M+$36.0M$79.7M7.8%
Year 2$45.1M+$53.9M$99.0M9.7%
Year 3$46.4M+$53.9M$100.4M9.8%
Year 4$47.8M+$53.9M$101.8M9.9%
Year 5$49.3M+$53.9M$103.2M10.1%
$424.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.14B
Exit EV (11x)
$710.3M
Value Created
$103.2M
Exit EBITDA
$67.7M
Organic Growth
$539.4M
RCM Value Creation
$103.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$10.3M$15.4M$20.5M$24.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$10.2M$15.2M$20.3M$24.4M
A/R Days Reduction$6.2M$9.4M$12.5M$15.0M
Clean Claim Rate$328K$492K$656K$787K
Total$27.0M$40.5M$53.9M$64.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 54 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.1%-15.4%3.5%12.6%
P50
Net-to-Gross26.8%12.9%18.2%25.2%
P78
Occupancy96.9%66.0%73.9%80.3%
P96
Rev/Bed$1.6M$1.2M$1.4M$1.7M
P63
Exp/Bed$1.5M$1.0M$1.5M$1.9M
P52

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML