Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — FORT DUNCAN MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 10:12 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — FORT DUNCAN MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 450092 | TX | 86 beds | Current EBITDA $17.7M → Pro Forma $22.0M (+$4.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$80.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$17.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$22.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$4.2M
Modeled Uplift
$2.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.8M (vs $4.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$980K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$52K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.6M$1.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.5M$44K$1.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$247K$733K$980K$3.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$52K$52K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT41.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$403K$805K$1.2M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$399K$797K$1.2M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$327K$653K$980K$980K$980K$980K$980K
Clean Claim Rate$0$26K$52K$52K$52K$52K$52K$52K
Cumulative$0$1.2M$2.3M$3.4M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x47% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x
9.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x
10.0x38% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x
11.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.7x
12.0x29% / 3.6x34% / 4.3x38% / 5.1x40% / 5.5x42% / 5.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.3x
Headroom (turns)
-5%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -5% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.8x, adding 1.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$17.7M$17.7M22.0%
Year 1$18.3M+$2.8M$21.1M26.2%
Year 2$18.8M+$4.2M$23.0M28.6%
Year 3$19.4M+$4.2M$23.6M29.3%
Year 4$19.9M+$4.2M$24.2M30.0%
Year 5$20.5M+$4.2M$24.8M30.8%
$177.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$272.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$95.4M
Value Created
$24.8M
Exit EBITDA
$28.2M
Organic Growth
$42.4M
RCM Value Creation
$24.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$805K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$797K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M
A/R Days Reduction$490K$735K$980K$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate$26K$39K$52K$62K
Total$2.1M$3.2M$4.2M$5.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 198 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin22.0%-11.0%2.2%11.6%
P91
Net-to-Gross12.6%16.9%27.7%41.5%
P9
Occupancy46.7%43.9%58.6%75.7%
P30
Rev/Bed$936K$285K$556K$1.2M
P67
Exp/Bed$730K$296K$495K$1.1M
P60

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML