Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SCOTT AND WHITE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:23 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SCOTT AND WHITE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 450054 | TX | 616 beds | Current EBITDA $-194.1M → Pro Forma $-96.6M (+$97.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.85B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-194.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$97.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-96.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$71.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$97.5M
Modeled Uplift
$70.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$27.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $70.0M (vs $97.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$37.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$36.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$22.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$1.2M
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$97.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$37.1M$37.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$35.7M$1.0M$36.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$5.7M$16.9M$22.6M$71.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$1.2M$1.2M$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT25.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$9.3M$18.5M$27.8M$37.1M$37.1M$37.1M$37.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$9.2M$18.3M$27.5M$36.7M$36.7M$36.7M$36.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$7.5M$15.0M$22.6M$22.6M$22.6M$22.6M$22.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$593K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Cumulative$0$26.6M$53.1M$79.1M$97.5M$97.5M$97.5M$97.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $97.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-194.1M$-194.1M-10.5%
Year 1$-200.0M+$65.0M$-135.0M-7.3%
Year 2$-206.0M+$97.5M$-108.5M-5.9%
Year 3$-212.1M+$97.5M$-114.6M-6.2%
Year 4$-218.5M+$97.5M$-121.0M-6.5%
Year 5$-225.1M+$97.5M$-127.6M-6.9%
$-1.94B
Entry EV (10x)
$-1.40B
Exit EV (11x)
$538.3M
Value Created
$-127.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-309.2M
Organic Growth
$975.1M
RCM Value Creation
$-127.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$18.5M$27.8M$37.1M$44.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$18.3M$27.5M$36.7M$44.0M
A/R Days Reduction$11.3M$16.9M$22.6M$27.1M
Clean Claim Rate$593K$890K$1.2M$1.4M
Total$48.8M$73.1M$97.5M$117.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 55 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-10.5%-13.7%2.8%12.6%
P25
Net-to-Gross24.5%13.1%18.0%25.2%
P69
Occupancy83.3%65.7%73.7%80.3%
P82
Rev/Bed$3.0M$1.2M$1.4M$1.8M
P91
Exp/Bed$3.3M$1.0M$1.5M$1.9M
P91

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML