Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SSH -NORTH KNOXVILLE 2026-04-26 07:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SSH -NORTH KNOXVILLE
CCN 442015 | TN | 65 beds | Current EBITDA $196K → Pro Forma $2.0M (+$1.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$33.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$196K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$1.8M
Modeled Uplift
$1.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$436K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.3M (vs $1.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$675K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$668K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$410K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$22K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$675K$675K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$649K$19K$668K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$104K$307K$410K$1.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$22K$22K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT42.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$169K$337K$506K$675K$675K$675K$675K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$167K$334K$501K$668K$668K$668K$668K
A/R Days Reduction$0$137K$274K$410K$410K$410K$410K$410K
Clean Claim Rate$0$11K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K
Cumulative$0$483K$966K$1.4M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x135% / 71.4x140% / 79.7x145% / 88.0x147% / 92.2x149% / 96.3x
9.0x129% / 63.1x134% / 70.5x139% / 77.9x141% / 81.6x143% / 85.3x
10.0x124% / 56.5x129% / 63.1x134% / 69.8x136% / 73.1x138% / 76.4x
11.0x120% / 51.1x125% / 57.1x129% / 63.1x131% / 66.2x133% / 69.2x
12.0x116% / 46.5x120% / 52.1x125% / 57.6x127% / 60.4x129% / 63.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.7x
Headroom (turns)
87%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 87% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.8x, adding 7.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$196K$196K0.6%
Year 1$202K+$1.2M$1.4M4.1%
Year 2$208K+$1.8M$2.0M5.9%
Year 3$214K+$1.8M$2.0M5.9%
Year 4$221K+$1.8M$2.0M5.9%
Year 5$227K+$1.8M$2.0M5.9%
$2.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$22.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$20.1M
Value Created
$2.0M
Exit EBITDA
$312K
Organic Growth
$17.7M
RCM Value Creation
$2.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$337K$506K$675K$810K
Denial Rate Reductio$334K$501K$668K$801K
A/R Days Reduction$205K$308K$410K$493K
Clean Claim Rate$11K$16K$22K$26K
Total$887K$1.3M$1.8M$2.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 63 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.6%-11.2%0.6%12.1%
P49
Net-to-Gross13.8%17.1%22.1%42.4%
P8
Occupancy91.3%28.9%62.4%74.4%
P98
Rev/Bed$519K$400K$550K$1.1M
P43
Exp/Bed$516K$349K$548K$1.1M
P41

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML