Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — TRISTAR HENDERSONVILLE MEDICAL CENTE 2026-04-26 08:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — TRISTAR HENDERSONVILLE MEDICAL CENTE
CCN 440194 | TN | 129 beds | Current EBITDA $86.5M → Pro Forma $97.5M (+$11.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$208.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$86.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$11.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$97.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$8.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$11.0M
Modeled Uplift
$7.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $7.9M (vs $11.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$134K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$11.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.2M$4.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.0M$115K$4.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$640K$1.9M$2.5M$8.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$134K$134K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.0M$2.1M$3.1M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.0M$2.1M$3.1M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$846K$1.7M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$67K$134K$134K$134K$134K$134K$134K
Cumulative$0$3.0M$6.0M$8.9M$11.0M$11.0M$11.0M$11.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $11.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
9.0x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x47% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x
10.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x
11.0x29% / 3.6x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.1x41% / 5.5x42% / 5.9x
12.0x25% / 3.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.4x37% / 4.8x39% / 5.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
-1.0x
Headroom (turns)
-16%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -16% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.5x, adding 1.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$86.5M$86.5M41.5%
Year 1$89.1M+$7.3M$96.4M46.2%
Year 2$91.8M+$11.0M$102.7M49.2%
Year 3$94.5M+$11.0M$105.5M50.6%
Year 4$97.3M+$11.0M$108.3M51.9%
Year 5$100.3M+$11.0M$111.2M53.3%
$864.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.22B
Exit EV (11x)
$358.7M
Value Created
$111.2M
Exit EBITDA
$137.8M
Organic Growth
$109.8M
RCM Value Creation
$111.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.1M$3.1M$4.2M$5.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.1M$3.1M$4.1M$5.0M
A/R Days Reduction$1.3M$1.9M$2.5M$3.0M
Clean Claim Rate$67K$100K$134K$160K
Total$5.5M$8.2M$11.0M$13.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 44 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin41.5%-7.1%2.1%14.4%
P95
Net-to-Gross12.3%15.5%18.5%28.9%
P5
Occupancy71.3%50.6%66.8%79.6%
P59
Rev/Bed$1.6M$509K$929K$1.4M
P88
Exp/Bed$947K$507K$780K$1.2M
P57

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML