Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — TRISTAR CENTENNIAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 12:36 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — TRISTAR CENTENNIAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 440161 | TN | 598 beds | Current EBITDA $228.0M → Pro Forma $280.2M (+$52.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$991.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$228.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$52.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$280.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$38.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$52.2M
Modeled Uplift
$35.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$16.9M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $35.3M (vs $52.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$19.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$19.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$12.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$635K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$52.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$19.8M$19.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$19.1M$545K$19.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$3.0M$9.0M$12.1M$38.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$635K$635K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$5.0M$9.9M$14.9M$19.8M$19.8M$19.8M$19.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$4.9M$9.8M$14.7M$19.6M$19.6M$19.6M$19.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$4.0M$8.0M$12.1M$12.1M$12.1M$12.1M$12.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$317K$635K$635K$635K$635K$635K$635K
Cumulative$0$14.2M$28.4M$42.3M$52.2M$52.2M$52.2M$52.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $52.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.7x59% / 10.3x
9.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x54% / 8.8x
10.0x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.6x
11.0x33% / 4.1x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x
12.0x29% / 3.5x34% / 4.3x38% / 5.0x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.4x
Headroom (turns)
-6%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -6% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.9x, adding 1.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$228.0M$228.0M23.0%
Year 1$234.8M+$34.8M$269.6M27.2%
Year 2$241.9M+$52.2M$294.0M29.6%
Year 3$249.1M+$52.2M$301.3M30.4%
Year 4$256.6M+$52.2M$308.8M31.1%
Year 5$264.3M+$52.2M$316.5M31.9%
$2.28B
Entry EV (10x)
$3.48B
Exit EV (11x)
$1.20B
Value Created
$316.5M
Exit EBITDA
$363.1M
Organic Growth
$521.8M
RCM Value Creation
$316.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$9.9M$14.9M$19.8M$23.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$9.8M$14.7M$19.6M$23.6M
A/R Days Reduction$6.0M$9.1M$12.1M$14.5M
Clean Claim Rate$317K$476K$635K$762K
Total$26.1M$39.1M$52.2M$62.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 16 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin23.0%-10.2%-6.0%4.0%
P88
Net-to-Gross14.4%17.5%21.5%28.2%
P12
Occupancy70.7%70.5%73.8%80.8%
P25
Rev/Bed$1.7M$1.0M$1.2M$1.5M
P88
Exp/Bed$1.3M$1.0M$1.2M$1.5M
P56

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML