Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — DELTA MEDICAL CENTER MEMPHIS 2026-04-26 09:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — DELTA MEDICAL CENTER MEMPHIS
CCN 440159 | TN | 10 beds | Current EBITDA $964K → Pro Forma $2.5M (+$1.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$28.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$964K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

59%
Realization (C)
$1.5M
Modeled Uplift
$880K
Risk-Adjusted
-$614K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 59% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Payer Diversity. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.9M (vs $1.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$568K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$562K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$345K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$18K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$568K$568K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$546K$16K$562K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$87K$258K$345K$1.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$18K$18K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT75.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$142K$284K$426K$568K$568K$568K$568K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$141K$281K$422K$562K$562K$562K$562K
A/R Days Reduction$0$115K$230K$345K$345K$345K$345K$345K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K
Cumulative$0$407K$813K$1.2M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x75% / 16.6x80% / 18.8x84% / 21.0x86% / 22.1x87% / 23.2x
9.0x70% / 14.4x75% / 16.3x79% / 18.3x81% / 19.2x82% / 20.2x
10.0x66% / 12.6x70% / 14.4x74% / 16.1x76% / 17.0x78% / 17.9x
11.0x62% / 11.2x66% / 12.8x70% / 14.4x72% / 15.2x74% / 16.0x
12.0x58% / 10.0x63% / 11.4x67% / 12.9x69% / 13.6x70% / 14.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.2x
Headroom (turns)
49%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 49% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.3x, adding 5.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$964K$964K3.4%
Year 1$993K+$996K$2.0M7.0%
Year 2$1.0M+$1.5M$2.5M8.9%
Year 3$1.1M+$1.5M$2.5M9.0%
Year 4$1.1M+$1.5M$2.6M9.1%
Year 5$1.1M+$1.5M$2.6M9.2%
$9.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$28.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$19.1M
Value Created
$2.6M
Exit EBITDA
$1.5M
Organic Growth
$14.9M
RCM Value Creation
$2.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$284K$426K$568K$681K
Denial Rate Reductio$281K$422K$562K$674K
A/R Days Reduction$173K$259K$345K$415K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$14K$18K$22K
Total$747K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 10 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.4%-27.2%-4.4%2.4%
P70
Net-to-Gross44.4%32.6%45.3%75.9%
P40
Occupancy0.1%23.7%29.4%73.5%
P0
Rev/Bed$2.8M$277K$659K$1.5M
P90
Exp/Bed$2.7M$261K$784K$1.8M
P80

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML