Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — FORT LOUDOUN MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 08:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — FORT LOUDOUN MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 440110 | TN | 30 beds | Current EBITDA $4.1M → Pro Forma $6.3M (+$2.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$41.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$4.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$6.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

77%
Realization (B)
$2.2M
Modeled Uplift
$1.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$508K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 77% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.7M (vs $2.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$825K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$817K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$502K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$26K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$825K$825K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$794K$23K$817K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$127K$376K$502K$1.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$26K$26K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT42.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$206K$413K$619K$825K$825K$825K$825K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$204K$409K$613K$817K$817K$817K$817K
A/R Days Reduction$0$167K$335K$502K$502K$502K$502K$502K
Clean Claim Rate$0$13K$26K$26K$26K$26K$26K$26K
Cumulative$0$591K$1.2M$1.8M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x55% / 9.1x60% / 10.4x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.5x67% / 13.2x
9.0x50% / 7.7x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x63% / 11.3x
10.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x
11.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x
12.0x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.9x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.9x
Headroom (turns)
15%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 15% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.6x, adding 2.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$4.1M$4.1M10.0%
Year 1$4.3M+$1.4M$5.7M13.9%
Year 2$4.4M+$2.2M$6.6M15.9%
Year 3$4.5M+$2.2M$6.7M16.2%
Year 4$4.7M+$2.2M$6.8M16.6%
Year 5$4.8M+$2.2M$7.0M16.9%
$41.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$76.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$35.3M
Value Created
$7.0M
Exit EBITDA
$6.6M
Organic Growth
$21.7M
RCM Value Creation
$7.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$413K$619K$825K$991K
Denial Rate Reductio$409K$613K$817K$981K
A/R Days Reduction$251K$377K$502K$603K
Clean Claim Rate$13K$20K$26K$32K
Total$1.1M$1.6M$2.2M$2.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 66 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin10.0%-13.5%-0.6%9.1%
P78
Net-to-Gross29.3%19.9%29.1%42.4%
P51
Occupancy93.9%23.7%42.1%68.4%
P98
Rev/Bed$1.4M$400K$549K$986K
P86
Exp/Bed$1.2M$352K$573K$1.0M
P83

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML