Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM INC. 2026-04-26 05:25 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM INC.
CCN 440091 | TN | 431 beds | Current EBITDA $-52.3M → Pro Forma $-21.6M (+$30.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$583.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-52.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$30.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-21.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$22.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$30.7M
Modeled Uplift
$20.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$10.0M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $20.7M (vs $30.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$11.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$11.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$7.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$374K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$30.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$11.7M$11.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$11.2M$321K$11.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.8M$5.3M$7.1M$22.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$374K$374K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT27.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.9M$5.8M$8.8M$11.7M$11.7M$11.7M$11.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.9M$5.8M$8.7M$11.6M$11.6M$11.6M$11.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.4M$4.7M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$187K$374K$374K$374K$374K$374K$374K
Cumulative$0$8.4M$16.7M$24.9M$30.7M$30.7M$30.7M$30.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $30.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-52.3M$-52.3M-9.0%
Year 1$-53.9M+$20.5M$-33.4M-5.7%
Year 2$-55.5M+$30.7M$-24.8M-4.2%
Year 3$-57.2M+$30.7M$-26.5M-4.5%
Year 4$-58.9M+$30.7M$-28.2M-4.8%
Year 5$-60.7M+$30.7M$-30.0M-5.1%
$-523.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$-329.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$193.8M
Value Created
$-30.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-83.4M
Organic Growth
$307.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-30.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.8M$8.8M$11.7M$14.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.8M$8.7M$11.6M$13.9M
A/R Days Reduction$3.6M$5.3M$7.1M$8.5M
Clean Claim Rate$187K$280K$374K$448K
Total$15.4M$23.0M$30.7M$36.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 21 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-9.0%-9.4%-5.5%7.4%
P29
Net-to-Gross21.1%15.3%20.1%27.0%
P57
Occupancy64.3%70.1%74.2%79.7%
P19
Rev/Bed$1.4M$1.0M$1.2M$1.4M
P57
Exp/Bed$1.5M$1.1M$1.2M$1.5M
P71

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML