Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — NORTHCREST MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 04:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — NORTHCREST MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 440065 | TN | 109 beds | Current EBITDA $-16.6M → Pro Forma $-13.3M (+$3.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$61.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-16.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-13.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$3.2M
Modeled Uplift
$2.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.0M (vs $3.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$751K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$39K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.2M$1.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.2M$34K$1.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$189K$562K$751K$2.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$39K$39K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$309K$617K$926K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$306K$611K$917K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$250K$501K$751K$751K$751K$751K$751K
Clean Claim Rate$0$20K$39K$39K$39K$39K$39K$39K
Cumulative$0$884K$1.8M$2.6M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-16.6M$-16.6M-26.8%
Year 1$-17.1M+$2.2M$-14.9M-24.1%
Year 2$-17.6M+$3.2M$-14.3M-23.2%
Year 3$-18.1M+$3.2M$-14.8M-24.0%
Year 4$-18.6M+$3.2M$-15.4M-24.9%
Year 5$-19.2M+$3.2M$-15.9M-25.8%
$-165.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$-175.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$-9.8M
Value Created
$-15.9M
Exit EBITDA
$-26.4M
Organic Growth
$32.5M
RCM Value Creation
$-15.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$617K$926K$1.2M$1.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$611K$917K$1.2M$1.5M
A/R Days Reduction$376K$563K$751K$901K
Clean Claim Rate$20K$30K$39K$47K
Total$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 48 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-26.8%-8.3%1.1%13.1%
P7
Net-to-Gross16.5%15.6%19.2%30.4%
P30
Occupancy25.6%41.1%66.2%76.9%
P10
Rev/Bed$566K$468K$920K$1.3M
P41
Exp/Bed$718K$384K$684K$1.2M
P50

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML