Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SAINT THOMAS RUTHERFORD HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 06:38 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SAINT THOMAS RUTHERFORD HOSPITAL
CCN 440053 | TN | 354 beds | Current EBITDA $6.0M → Pro Forma $29.6M (+$23.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$447.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$6.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$23.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$29.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$17.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$23.5M
Modeled Uplift
$17.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $17.1M (vs $23.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$8.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$8.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$286K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$23.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$8.9M$8.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$8.6M$246K$8.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.4M$4.1M$5.4M$17.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$286K$286K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT27.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.2M$4.5M$6.7M$8.9M$8.9M$8.9M$8.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.2M$4.4M$6.6M$8.9M$8.9M$8.9M$8.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.8M$3.6M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$143K$286K$286K$286K$286K$286K$286K
Cumulative$0$6.4M$12.8M$19.1M$23.5M$23.5M$23.5M$23.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $23.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x102% / 33.7x107% / 37.8x111% / 42.0x113% / 44.0x115% / 46.1x
9.0x97% / 29.6x102% / 33.3x106% / 36.9x108% / 38.8x110% / 40.6x
10.0x92% / 26.3x97% / 29.6x101% / 32.9x103% / 34.5x105% / 36.2x
11.0x88% / 23.6x93% / 26.6x97% / 29.6x99% / 31.1x101% / 32.6x
12.0x85% / 21.4x89% / 24.1x93% / 26.9x95% / 28.2x97% / 29.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.8x
Headroom (turns)
73%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 73% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.7x, adding 6.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$6.0M$6.0M1.3%
Year 1$6.2M+$15.7M$21.9M4.9%
Year 2$6.4M+$23.5M$29.9M6.7%
Year 3$6.6M+$23.5M$30.1M6.7%
Year 4$6.8M+$23.5M$30.3M6.8%
Year 5$7.0M+$23.5M$30.5M6.8%
$60.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$335.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$275.5M
Value Created
$30.5M
Exit EBITDA
$9.6M
Organic Growth
$235.4M
RCM Value Creation
$30.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.5M$6.7M$8.9M$10.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.4M$6.6M$8.9M$10.6M
A/R Days Reduction$2.7M$4.1M$5.4M$6.5M
Clean Claim Rate$143K$215K$286K$344K
Total$11.8M$17.7M$23.5M$28.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 23 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.3%-8.8%1.3%7.7%
P48
Net-to-Gross21.9%14.0%20.1%27.6%
P61
Occupancy87.6%67.2%74.2%80.7%
P91
Rev/Bed$1.3M$1.1M$1.3M$1.4M
P48
Exp/Bed$1.2M$908K$1.2M$1.4M
P48

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML