Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ROANE COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 09:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ROANE COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 440031 | TN | 52 beds | Current EBITDA $1.1M → Pro Forma $3.4M (+$2.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$44.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$2.3M
Modeled Uplift
$1.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$728K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.6M (vs $2.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$886K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$877K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$539K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$28K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$886K$886K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$853K$24K$877K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$136K$403K$539K$1.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$28K$28K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT42.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$221K$443K$664K$886K$886K$886K$886K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$219K$438K$658K$877K$877K$877K$877K
A/R Days Reduction$0$180K$359K$539K$539K$539K$539K$539K
Clean Claim Rate$0$14K$28K$28K$28K$28K$28K$28K
Cumulative$0$634K$1.3M$1.9M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x84% / 21.2x89% / 23.9x93% / 26.6x95% / 28.0x97% / 29.4x
9.0x79% / 18.5x84% / 20.9x88% / 23.3x90% / 24.5x91% / 25.7x
10.0x75% / 16.3x79% / 18.5x83% / 20.7x85% / 21.7x87% / 22.8x
11.0x71% / 14.5x75% / 16.5x79% / 18.5x81% / 19.5x83% / 20.5x
12.0x67% / 13.1x72% / 14.9x76% / 16.7x77% / 17.6x79% / 18.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.8x
Headroom (turns)
59%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 59% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.7x, adding 5.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.1M$1.1M2.4%
Year 1$1.1M+$1.6M$2.7M6.0%
Year 2$1.1M+$2.3M$3.5M7.8%
Year 3$1.2M+$2.3M$3.5M7.9%
Year 4$1.2M+$2.3M$3.5M8.0%
Year 5$1.2M+$2.3M$3.6M8.1%
$10.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$39.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$28.6M
Value Created
$3.6M
Exit EBITDA
$1.7M
Organic Growth
$23.3M
RCM Value Creation
$3.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$443K$664K$886K$1.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$438K$658K$877K$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$269K$404K$539K$647K
Clean Claim Rate$14K$21K$28K$34K
Total$1.2M$1.7M$2.3M$2.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 60 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.4%-11.3%0.6%11.9%
P54
Net-to-Gross30.0%17.9%26.8%42.9%
P61
Occupancy60.0%33.4%63.3%81.9%
P43
Rev/Bed$852K$372K$549K$1.1M
P63
Exp/Bed$831K$345K$521K$1.1M
P63

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML