Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BRISTOL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 04:02 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BRISTOL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 440012 | TN | 244 beds | Current EBITDA $9.3M → Pro Forma $24.8M (+$15.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$293.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$9.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$15.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$24.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$11.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$15.5M
Modeled Uplift
$11.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $11.1M (vs $15.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$188K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$15.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.9M$5.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.7M$162K$5.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$902K$2.7M$3.6M$11.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$188K$188K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT27.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.5M$2.9M$4.4M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.5M$2.9M$4.4M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$94K$188K$188K$188K$188K$188K$188K
Cumulative$0$4.2M$8.4M$12.5M$15.5M$15.5M$15.5M$15.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $15.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x77% / 17.4x81% / 19.6x85% / 21.9x87% / 23.1x89% / 24.2x
9.0x72% / 15.1x76% / 17.1x80% / 19.1x82% / 20.1x84% / 21.2x
10.0x68% / 13.2x72% / 15.1x76% / 16.9x78% / 17.8x80% / 18.7x
11.0x64% / 11.7x68% / 13.4x72% / 15.1x74% / 15.9x76% / 16.7x
12.0x60% / 10.5x64% / 12.0x68% / 13.5x70% / 14.3x72% / 15.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.3x
Headroom (turns)
51%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 51% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.2x, adding 5.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$9.3M$9.3M3.2%
Year 1$9.6M+$10.3M$19.9M6.8%
Year 2$9.9M+$15.5M$25.4M8.6%
Year 3$10.2M+$15.5M$25.7M8.7%
Year 4$10.5M+$15.5M$26.0M8.8%
Year 5$10.8M+$15.5M$26.3M8.9%
$93.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$289.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$195.8M
Value Created
$26.3M
Exit EBITDA
$14.9M
Organic Growth
$154.6M
RCM Value Creation
$26.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.9M$4.4M$5.9M$7.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.9M$4.4M$5.8M$7.0M
A/R Days Reduction$1.8M$2.7M$3.6M$4.3M
Clean Claim Rate$94K$141K$188K$226K
Total$7.7M$11.6M$15.5M$18.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 28 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.2%-8.2%1.8%11.6%
P54
Net-to-Gross19.7%13.3%19.8%27.0%
P46
Occupancy79.3%55.9%70.7%79.4%
P71
Rev/Bed$1.2M$915K$1.2M$1.4M
P54
Exp/Bed$1.2M$767K$1.0M$1.3M
P57

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML