Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 05:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 433027 | SD | 40 beds | Current EBITDA $-815K → Pro Forma $124K (+$939K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$17.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-815K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$939K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$124K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$685K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$939K
Modeled Uplift
$699K
Risk-Adjusted
-$240K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$357K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$353K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$217K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$11K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$939K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$357K$357K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$344K$10K$353K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$55K$162K$217K$685K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$11K$11K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT55.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$89K$178K$268K$357K$357K$357K$357K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$88K$177K$265K$353K$353K$353K$353K
A/R Days Reduction$0$72K$145K$217K$217K$217K$217K$217K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K
Cumulative$0$256K$511K$761K$939K$939K$939K$939K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $939K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-55.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
62.3x
Headroom (turns)
958%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 958% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -55.8x, adding 154.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-815K$-815K-4.6%
Year 1$-840K+$626K$-214K-1.2%
Year 2$-865K+$939K$74K0.4%
Year 3$-891K+$939K$48K0.3%
Year 4$-918K+$939K$21K0.1%
Year 5$-945K+$939K$-6K-0.0%
$-8.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$-68K
Exit EV (11x)
$8.1M
Value Created
$-6K
Exit EBITDA
$-1.3M
Organic Growth
$9.4M
RCM Value Creation
$-6K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$178K$268K$357K$428K
Denial Rate Reductio$177K$265K$353K$424K
A/R Days Reduction$109K$163K$217K$261K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$11K$14K
Total$469K$704K$939K$1.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 38 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-4.6%-7.9%-2.5%8.5%
P42
Net-to-Gross52.6%35.7%49.3%55.8%
P64
Occupancy83.2%14.7%26.7%41.0%
P97
Rev/Bed$446K$604K$1.1M$2.2M
P11
Exp/Bed$467K$669K$1.2M$2.3M
P11

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML