Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PHILIP HEALTH SERVICES INC 2026-04-26 05:02 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PHILIP HEALTH SERVICES INC
CCN 431319 | SD | 18 beds | Current EBITDA $336K → Pro Forma $1.3M (+$925K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$17.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$336K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$925K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$674K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$925K
Modeled Uplift
$637K
Risk-Adjusted
-$287K
Execution Discount
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Net-to-Gross Ratio, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$351K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$348K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$214K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$11K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$925K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$351K$351K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$338K$10K$348K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$54K$160K$214K$674K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$11K$11K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT66.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$88K$176K$264K$351K$351K$351K$351K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$87K$174K$261K$348K$348K$348K$348K
A/R Days Reduction$0$71K$143K$214K$214K$214K$214K$214K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K
Cumulative$0$252K$504K$750K$925K$925K$925K$925K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $925K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x91% / 25.4x95% / 28.5x100% / 31.7x102% / 33.3x103% / 34.9x
9.0x86% / 22.2x90% / 25.0x94% / 27.8x96% / 29.2x98% / 30.6x
10.0x81% / 19.6x86% / 22.2x90% / 24.7x92% / 26.0x94% / 27.3x
11.0x77% / 17.6x82% / 19.9x86% / 22.2x88% / 23.3x90% / 24.5x
12.0x74% / 15.8x78% / 17.9x82% / 20.1x84% / 21.1x86% / 22.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.2x
Headroom (turns)
65%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 65% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.3x, adding 6.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$336K$336K1.9%
Year 1$346K+$616K$962K5.5%
Year 2$356K+$925K$1.3M7.3%
Year 3$367K+$925K$1.3M7.4%
Year 4$378K+$925K$1.3M7.4%
Year 5$390K+$925K$1.3M7.5%
$3.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$14.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$11.1M
Value Created
$1.3M
Exit EBITDA
$535K
Organic Growth
$9.2M
RCM Value Creation
$1.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$176K$264K$351K$422K
Denial Rate Reductio$174K$261K$348K$418K
A/R Days Reduction$107K$160K$214K$257K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$8K$11K$13K
Total$462K$693K$925K$1.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 41 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.9%-8.3%-1.6%9.4%
P65
Net-to-Gross72.3%49.6%54.4%66.8%
P88
Occupancy50.0%13.5%20.4%37.6%
P88
Rev/Bed$976K$589K$961K$1.2M
P57
Exp/Bed$958K$619K$961K$1.2M
P46

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML