Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SIOUX FALLS SPECIALTY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 10:37 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SIOUX FALLS SPECIALTY HOSPITAL
CCN 430090 | SD | 33 beds | Current EBITDA $44.0M → Pro Forma $51.3M (+$7.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$138.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$44.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$7.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$51.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$5.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$7.3M
Modeled Uplift
$4.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.8M (vs $7.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$89K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$7.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.8M$2.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.7M$76K$2.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$426K$1.3M$1.7M$5.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$89K$89K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT56.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$694K$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$687K$1.4M$2.1M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$563K$1.1M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$44K$89K$89K$89K$89K$89K$89K
Cumulative$0$2.0M$4.0M$5.9M$7.3M$7.3M$7.3M$7.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $7.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x45% / 6.4x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.7x
9.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x52% / 8.2x
10.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x
11.0x31% / 3.8x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x
12.0x26% / 3.2x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x38% / 5.0x40% / 5.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.8x
Headroom (turns)
-12%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -12% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.3x, adding 1.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$44.0M$44.0M31.7%
Year 1$45.3M+$4.9M$50.2M36.1%
Year 2$46.7M+$7.3M$54.0M38.9%
Year 3$48.1M+$7.3M$55.4M39.9%
Year 4$49.5M+$7.3M$56.8M40.9%
Year 5$51.0M+$7.3M$58.3M42.0%
$439.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$641.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$201.4M
Value Created
$58.3M
Exit EBITDA
$70.1M
Organic Growth
$73.0M
RCM Value Creation
$58.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$3.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.4M$2.1M$2.7M$3.3M
A/R Days Reduction$845K$1.3M$1.7M$2.0M
Clean Claim Rate$44K$67K$89K$107K
Total$3.7M$5.5M$7.3M$8.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 40 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin31.7%-7.4%-1.6%8.8%
P95
Net-to-Gross28.6%36.1%50.5%56.6%
P5
Occupancy10.6%14.0%25.3%42.3%
P8
Rev/Bed$4.2M$602K$1.0M$2.1M
P89
Exp/Bed$2.9M$643K$1.1M$2.1M
P85

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML