Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BROOKINGS HEALTH SYSTEM 2026-04-26 05:02 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BROOKINGS HEALTH SYSTEM
CCN 430008 | SD | 49 beds | Current EBITDA $3.5M → Pro Forma $7.7M (+$4.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$79.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$7.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$4.2M
Modeled Uplift
$2.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.6M (vs $4.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$963K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$51K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.6M$1.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.5M$44K$1.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$243K$720K$963K$3.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$51K$51K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT53.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$396K$791K$1.2M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$392K$783K$1.2M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$321K$642K$963K$963K$963K$963K$963K
Clean Claim Rate$0$25K$51K$51K$51K$51K$51K$51K
Cumulative$0$1.1M$2.3M$3.4M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x69% / 13.8x73% / 15.7x77% / 17.6x79% / 18.5x81% / 19.5x
9.0x64% / 11.9x69% / 13.6x73% / 15.3x74% / 16.1x76% / 17.0x
10.0x60% / 10.4x64% / 11.9x68% / 13.4x70% / 14.2x72% / 14.9x
11.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.5x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.6x68% / 13.3x
12.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.4x60% / 10.7x62% / 11.3x64% / 11.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.6x
Headroom (turns)
40%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 40% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.9x, adding 4.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.5M$3.5M4.5%
Year 1$3.7M+$2.8M$6.4M8.1%
Year 2$3.8M+$4.2M$7.9M10.0%
Year 3$3.9M+$4.2M$8.0M10.2%
Year 4$4.0M+$4.2M$8.2M10.3%
Year 5$4.1M+$4.2M$8.3M10.5%
$35.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$91.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$55.5M
Value Created
$8.3M
Exit EBITDA
$5.7M
Organic Growth
$41.6M
RCM Value Creation
$8.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$791K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$783K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M
A/R Days Reduction$481K$722K$963K$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate$25K$38K$51K$61K
Total$2.1M$3.1M$4.2M$5.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 32 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.5%-7.6%-3.2%7.4%
P70
Net-to-Gross47.8%35.6%48.1%53.3%
P47
Occupancy26.6%17.6%27.1%40.9%
P44
Rev/Bed$1.6M$856K$1.3M$2.6M
P57
Exp/Bed$1.5M$846K$1.6M$2.6M
P47

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML