Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 10:37 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 423025 | SC | 96 beds | Current EBITDA $6.1M → Pro Forma $8.0M (+$1.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$35.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$6.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$8.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$1.8M
Modeled Uplift
$1.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$563K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.3M (vs $1.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$702K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$695K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$427K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$22K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$702K$702K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$676K$19K$695K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$108K$319K$427K$1.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$22K$22K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$176K$351K$527K$702K$702K$702K$702K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$174K$348K$521K$695K$695K$695K$695K
A/R Days Reduction$0$142K$285K$427K$427K$427K$427K$427K
Clean Claim Rate$0$11K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K
Cumulative$0$503K$1.0M$1.5M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.0x
9.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.4x
10.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x
11.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x
12.0x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x40% / 5.5x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.0x
Headroom (turns)
-0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.5x, adding 2.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$6.1M$6.1M17.4%
Year 1$6.3M+$1.2M$7.5M21.5%
Year 2$6.5M+$1.8M$8.3M23.8%
Year 3$6.7M+$1.8M$8.5M24.3%
Year 4$6.9M+$1.8M$8.7M24.9%
Year 5$7.1M+$1.8M$8.9M25.5%
$61.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$98.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$37.2M
Value Created
$8.9M
Exit EBITDA
$9.8M
Organic Growth
$18.5M
RCM Value Creation
$8.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$351K$527K$702K$842K
Denial Rate Reductio$348K$521K$695K$834K
A/R Days Reduction$214K$320K$427K$513K
Clean Claim Rate$11K$17K$22K$27K
Total$923K$1.4M$1.8M$2.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 38 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin17.4%-7.2%6.7%18.1%
P70
Net-to-Gross69.0%18.8%26.4%31.5%
P86
Occupancy66.6%51.5%65.0%75.3%
P53
Rev/Bed$366K$449K$1.1M$1.6M
P22
Exp/Bed$302K$327K$1.1M$1.5M
P21

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML