Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — REGENCY HOSPITAL OF FLORENCE 2026-04-26 12:31 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — REGENCY HOSPITAL OF FLORENCE
CCN 422007 | SC | 44 beds | Current EBITDA $-2.4M → Pro Forma $-1.2M (+$1.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$23.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-2.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-1.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$881K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$1.2M
Modeled Uplift
$924K
Risk-Adjusted
-$284K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like

Expected realization: 77% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.9M (vs $1.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$459K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$455K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$279K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$15K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$459K$459K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$442K$13K$455K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$70K$209K$279K$881K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$15K$15K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT60.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$115K$230K$344K$459K$459K$459K$459K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$114K$227K$341K$455K$455K$455K$455K
A/R Days Reduction$0$93K$186K$279K$279K$279K$279K$279K
Clean Claim Rate$0$7K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K
Cumulative$0$329K$658K$979K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-2.4M$-2.4M-10.6%
Year 1$-2.5M+$805K$-1.7M-7.4%
Year 2$-2.6M+$1.2M$-1.4M-6.0%
Year 3$-2.7M+$1.2M$-1.5M-6.3%
Year 4$-2.7M+$1.2M$-1.5M-6.7%
Year 5$-2.8M+$1.2M$-1.6M-7.0%
$-24.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$-17.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$6.6M
Value Created
$-1.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-3.9M
Organic Growth
$12.1M
RCM Value Creation
$-1.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$230K$344K$459K$551K
Denial Rate Reductio$227K$341K$455K$545K
A/R Days Reduction$140K$210K$279K$335K
Clean Claim Rate$7K$11K$15K$18K
Total$604K$906K$1.2M$1.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 43 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-10.6%-11.5%2.0%16.6%
P26
Net-to-Gross10.6%22.4%28.5%60.0%
P2
Occupancy91.6%40.3%65.0%75.5%
P93
Rev/Bed$522K$455K$726K$1.8M
P35
Exp/Bed$577K$412K$695K$1.7M
P40

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML