Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CONTINUECARE HOSP AT PALMETTO HEALTH 2026-04-26 08:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CONTINUECARE HOSP AT PALMETTO HEALTH
CCN 422006 | SC | 35 beds | Current EBITDA $221K → Pro Forma $965K (+$743K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$14.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$221K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$743K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$965K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+527bps
Margin Improvement
$541K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$743K
Modeled Uplift
$518K
Risk-Adjusted
-$226K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$282K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$280K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$172K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$743K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$282K$282K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$272K$8K$280K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$43K$128K$172K$541K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT60.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$71K$141K$212K$282K$282K$282K$282K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$70K$140K$210K$280K$280K$280K$280K
A/R Days Reduction$0$57K$114K$172K$172K$172K$172K$172K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$203K$405K$603K$743K$743K$743K$743K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $743K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x97% / 29.8x102% / 33.5x106% / 37.1x108% / 39.0x110% / 40.8x
9.0x92% / 26.1x97% / 29.4x101% / 32.6x103% / 34.3x105% / 35.9x
10.0x88% / 23.2x92% / 26.1x96% / 29.1x98% / 30.5x100% / 32.0x
11.0x83% / 20.8x88% / 23.4x92% / 26.1x94% / 27.5x96% / 28.8x
12.0x80% / 18.8x84% / 21.2x88% / 23.7x90% / 24.9x92% / 26.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.6x
Headroom (turns)
70%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 70% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.9x, adding 6.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$221K$221K1.6%
Year 1$228K+$495K$723K5.1%
Year 2$235K+$743K$978K6.9%
Year 3$242K+$743K$985K7.0%
Year 4$249K+$743K$992K7.0%
Year 5$257K+$743K$1000K7.1%
$2.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$11.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$8.8M
Value Created
$1000K
Exit EBITDA
$352K
Organic Growth
$7.4M
RCM Value Creation
$1000K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$141K$212K$282K$339K
Denial Rate Reductio$140K$210K$280K$336K
A/R Days Reduction$86K$129K$172K$206K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$372K$557K$743K$892K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 38 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.6%-13.4%1.5%16.2%
P50
Net-to-Gross40.7%23.2%31.8%60.0%
P66
Occupancy64.3%44.1%64.9%76.1%
P47
Rev/Bed$403K$450K$616K$1.8M
P16
Exp/Bed$397K$404K$676K$1.6M
P24

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML