Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ROPER ST. FRANCIS MT PLEASANT HOSPIT 2026-04-26 03:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ROPER ST. FRANCIS MT PLEASANT HOSPIT
CCN 420104 | SC | 85 beds | Current EBITDA $10.6M → Pro Forma $16.3M (+$5.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$107.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$10.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$16.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$5.6M
Modeled Uplift
$3.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.6M (vs $5.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$69K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.1M$2.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.1M$59K$2.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$329K$976K$1.3M$4.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$69K$69K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$536K$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$531K$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$435K$870K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$34K$69K$69K$69K$69K$69K$69K
Cumulative$0$1.5M$3.1M$4.6M$5.6M$5.6M$5.6M$5.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x56% / 9.1x60% / 10.5x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.6x68% / 13.2x
9.0x51% / 7.7x55% / 9.0x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x
10.0x46% / 6.6x51% / 7.7x55% / 8.8x56% / 9.4x58% / 9.9x
11.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x
12.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.0x
Headroom (turns)
15%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 15% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.5x, adding 2.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$10.6M$10.6M9.9%
Year 1$10.9M+$3.8M$14.7M13.7%
Year 2$11.3M+$5.6M$16.9M15.8%
Year 3$11.6M+$5.6M$17.3M16.1%
Year 4$12.0M+$5.6M$17.6M16.4%
Year 5$12.3M+$5.6M$18.0M16.7%
$106.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$197.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$91.3M
Value Created
$18.0M
Exit EBITDA
$16.9M
Organic Growth
$56.4M
RCM Value Creation
$18.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M$2.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M$2.5M
A/R Days Reduction$653K$979K$1.3M$1.6M
Clean Claim Rate$34K$51K$69K$82K
Total$2.8M$4.2M$5.6M$6.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 39 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin9.9%-6.7%10.0%19.2%
P47
Net-to-Gross27.9%19.6%26.4%32.6%
P63
Occupancy32.3%50.5%66.6%75.5%
P5
Rev/Bed$1.3M$450K$967K$1.7M
P58
Exp/Bed$1.1M$339K$1.0M$1.5M
P56

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML