Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PH HILLCREST HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PH HILLCREST HOSPITAL
CCN 420037 | SC | 43 beds | Current EBITDA $38.1M → Pro Forma $44.6M (+$6.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$123.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$38.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$6.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$44.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$6.5M
Modeled Uplift
$4.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.7M (vs $6.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$79K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$6.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.5M$2.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.4M$68K$2.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$379K$1.1M$1.5M$4.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$79K$79K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT60.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$618K$1.2M$1.9M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$612K$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$501K$1.0M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$40K$79K$79K$79K$79K$79K$79K
Cumulative$0$1.8M$3.5M$5.3M$6.5M$6.5M$6.5M$6.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $6.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.7x
9.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x
10.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x
11.0x31% / 3.8x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x
12.0x26% / 3.2x32% / 4.0x36% / 4.7x38% / 5.0x40% / 5.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.7x
Headroom (turns)
-11%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -11% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.2x, adding 1.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$38.1M$38.1M30.8%
Year 1$39.2M+$4.3M$43.6M35.2%
Year 2$40.4M+$6.5M$46.9M37.9%
Year 3$41.6M+$6.5M$48.1M38.9%
Year 4$42.9M+$6.5M$49.4M39.9%
Year 5$44.1M+$6.5M$50.6M41.0%
$380.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$557.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$176.3M
Value Created
$50.6M
Exit EBITDA
$60.6M
Organic Growth
$65.0M
RCM Value Creation
$50.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.2M$1.9M$2.5M$3.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.9M
A/R Days Reduction$752K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
Clean Claim Rate$40K$59K$79K$95K
Total$3.3M$4.9M$6.5M$7.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 43 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin30.8%-11.5%2.0%16.6%
P88
Net-to-Gross26.5%22.4%28.5%60.0%
P40
Occupancy61.6%40.3%65.0%75.5%
P44
Rev/Bed$2.9M$455K$726K$1.8M
P95
Exp/Bed$2.0M$412K$695K$1.7M
P81

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML