Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SAN JUAN CP HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:08 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SAN JUAN CP HOSPITAL
CCN 404005 | PR | 165 beds | Current EBITDA $3.2M → Pro Forma $5.1M (+$2.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$37.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$2.0M
Modeled Uplift
$1.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$568K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.4M (vs $2.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$742K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$734K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$451K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$24K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$742K$742K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$714K$20K$734K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$114K$338K$451K$1.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$24K$24K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT73.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$185K$371K$556K$742K$742K$742K$742K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$184K$367K$551K$734K$734K$734K$734K
A/R Days Reduction$0$150K$301K$451K$451K$451K$451K$451K
Clean Claim Rate$0$12K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K
Cumulative$0$531K$1.1M$1.6M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x58% / 9.7x62% / 11.2x66% / 12.6x68% / 13.3x70% / 14.0x
9.0x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.6x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.5x65% / 12.1x
10.0x48% / 7.1x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.4x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x
11.0x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
12.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.3x
Headroom (turns)
19%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 19% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.2x, adding 3.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.2M$3.2M8.6%
Year 1$3.3M+$1.3M$4.6M12.4%
Year 2$3.4M+$2.0M$5.3M14.4%
Year 3$3.5M+$2.0M$5.4M14.6%
Year 4$3.6M+$2.0M$5.5M14.9%
Year 5$3.7M+$2.0M$5.6M15.2%
$31.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$62.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$30.2M
Value Created
$5.6M
Exit EBITDA
$5.1M
Organic Growth
$19.5M
RCM Value Creation
$5.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$371K$556K$742K$890K
Denial Rate Reductio$367K$551K$734K$881K
A/R Days Reduction$226K$339K$451K$542K
Clean Claim Rate$12K$18K$24K$28K
Total$976K$1.5M$2.0M$2.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 38 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin8.6%-20.2%-6.4%1.1%
P92
Net-to-Gross41.0%54.2%58.3%73.4%
P5
Occupancy80.4%44.9%67.2%74.4%
P89
Rev/Bed$225K$247K$370K$465K
P18
Exp/Bed$205K$295K$396K$482K
P8

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML