Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. MARY REHABILITATION HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. MARY REHABILITATION HOSPITAL
CCN 393055 | PA | 50 beds | Current EBITDA $10.9M → Pro Forma $12.5M (+$1.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$29.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$10.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$12.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$1.6M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$426K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$598K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$592K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$364K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$19K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$598K$598K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$575K$16K$592K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$92K$272K$364K$1.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$19K$19K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT42.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$149K$299K$448K$598K$598K$598K$598K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$148K$296K$444K$592K$592K$592K$592K
A/R Days Reduction$0$121K$242K$364K$364K$364K$364K$364K
Clean Claim Rate$0$10K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K
Cumulative$0$428K$856K$1.3M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x
9.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x
10.0x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x
11.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.5x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x
12.0x25% / 3.1x31% / 3.8x35% / 4.5x37% / 4.9x39% / 5.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.9x
Headroom (turns)
-14%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -14% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.4x, adding 1.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$10.9M$10.9M36.5%
Year 1$11.2M+$1.0M$12.3M41.1%
Year 2$11.6M+$1.6M$13.1M44.0%
Year 3$11.9M+$1.6M$13.5M45.1%
Year 4$12.3M+$1.6M$13.8M46.3%
Year 5$12.6M+$1.6M$14.2M47.5%
$109.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$156.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$47.3M
Value Created
$14.2M
Exit EBITDA
$17.4M
Organic Growth
$15.7M
RCM Value Creation
$14.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$299K$448K$598K$717K
Denial Rate Reductio$296K$444K$592K$710K
A/R Days Reduction$182K$273K$364K$436K
Clean Claim Rate$10K$14K$19K$23K
Total$786K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 91 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin36.5%-16.4%0.4%8.5%
P99
Net-to-Gross51.2%18.5%30.7%42.4%
P82
Occupancy79.5%31.9%52.8%72.4%
P85
Rev/Bed$598K$414K$755K$1.5M
P46
Exp/Bed$380K$400K$871K$1.5M
P20

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML