Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MAGEE REHABILITATION HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:07 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MAGEE REHABILITATION HOSPITAL
CCN 393038 | PA | 83 beds | Current EBITDA $-19.2M → Pro Forma $-15.9M (+$3.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$62.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-19.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-15.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$3.3M
Modeled Uplift
$2.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$851K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.4M (vs $3.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$754K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$40K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.2M$1.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.2M$34K$1.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$190K$564K$754K$2.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$40K$40K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$310K$620K$930K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$307K$614K$921K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$251K$503K$754K$754K$754K$754K$754K
Clean Claim Rate$0$20K$40K$40K$40K$40K$40K$40K
Cumulative$0$888K$1.8M$2.6M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-19.2M$-19.2M-30.9%
Year 1$-19.7M+$2.2M$-17.6M-28.3%
Year 2$-20.3M+$3.3M$-17.1M-27.6%
Year 3$-21.0M+$3.3M$-17.7M-28.5%
Year 4$-21.6M+$3.3M$-18.3M-29.5%
Year 5$-22.2M+$3.3M$-19.0M-30.6%
$-191.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$-208.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$-16.9M
Value Created
$-19.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-30.5M
Organic Growth
$32.6M
RCM Value Creation
$-19.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$620K$930K$1.2M$1.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$614K$921K$1.2M$1.5M
A/R Days Reduction$377K$566K$754K$905K
Clean Claim Rate$20K$30K$40K$48K
Total$1.6M$2.4M$3.3M$3.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 103 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-30.9%-19.5%-4.5%8.4%
P14
Net-to-Gross32.2%18.6%29.2%38.6%
P59
Occupancy86.7%36.8%57.2%75.1%
P91
Rev/Bed$747K$412K$613K$1.2M
P53
Exp/Bed$978K$403K$749K$1.3M
P57

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML