Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SSH - PITTSBURGH / UPMC 2026-04-26 14:07 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SSH - PITTSBURGH / UPMC
CCN 392044 | PA | 67 beds | Current EBITDA $1.4M → Pro Forma $2.8M (+$1.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$27.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$1.5M
Modeled Uplift
$1.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$455K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$558K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$552K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$340K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$18K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$558K$558K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$537K$15K$552K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$86K$254K$340K$1.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$18K$18K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$140K$279K$419K$558K$558K$558K$558K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$138K$276K$414K$552K$552K$552K$552K
A/R Days Reduction$0$113K$226K$340K$340K$340K$340K$340K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K
Cumulative$0$400K$799K$1.2M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x67% / 13.2x72% / 15.0x76% / 16.8x78% / 17.7x79% / 18.6x
9.0x63% / 11.3x67% / 12.9x71% / 14.6x73% / 15.4x75% / 16.2x
10.0x58% / 9.9x63% / 11.3x66% / 12.8x68% / 13.5x70% / 14.2x
11.0x54% / 8.7x59% / 10.0x63% / 11.3x64% / 12.0x66% / 12.7x
12.0x50% / 7.7x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x63% / 11.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.4x
Headroom (turns)
38%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 38% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.1x, adding 4.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.4M$1.4M4.9%
Year 1$1.4M+$979K$2.4M8.5%
Year 2$1.4M+$1.5M$2.9M10.4%
Year 3$1.5M+$1.5M$2.9M10.6%
Year 4$1.5M+$1.5M$3.0M10.7%
Year 5$1.6M+$1.5M$3.0M10.9%
$13.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$33.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$19.9M
Value Created
$3.0M
Exit EBITDA
$2.2M
Organic Growth
$14.7M
RCM Value Creation
$3.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$279K$419K$558K$670K
Denial Rate Reductio$276K$414K$552K$663K
A/R Days Reduction$170K$255K$340K$407K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$13K$18K$21K
Total$734K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 96 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.9%-18.3%-0.4%8.9%
P59
Net-to-Gross11.3%18.6%30.3%38.3%
P0
Occupancy61.0%35.3%56.2%71.9%
P59
Rev/Bed$416K$406K$619K$1.2M
P28
Exp/Bed$396K$395K$827K$1.3M
P25

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML