Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SSH - ERIE 2026-04-26 12:34 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SSH - ERIE
CCN 392037 | PA | 50 beds | Current EBITDA $288K → Pro Forma $1.1M (+$804K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$15.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$288K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$804K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$586K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$804K
Modeled Uplift
$522K
Risk-Adjusted
-$282K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$305K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$302K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$186K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$804K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$305K$305K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$294K$8K$302K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$47K$139K$186K$586K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT42.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$76K$153K$229K$305K$305K$305K$305K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$76K$151K$227K$302K$302K$302K$302K
A/R Days Reduction$0$62K$124K$186K$186K$186K$186K$186K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$219K$438K$652K$804K$804K$804K$804K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $804K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x91% / 25.6x96% / 28.9x100% / 32.1x102% / 33.7x104% / 35.3x
9.0x86% / 22.4x91% / 25.3x95% / 28.1x97% / 29.6x99% / 31.0x
10.0x82% / 19.9x86% / 22.4x90% / 25.0x92% / 26.3x94% / 27.6x
11.0x78% / 17.8x82% / 20.1x86% / 22.4x88% / 23.6x90% / 24.8x
12.0x74% / 16.0x79% / 18.1x83% / 20.3x84% / 21.4x86% / 22.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.3x
Headroom (turns)
66%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 66% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.2x, adding 6.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$288K$288K1.9%
Year 1$296K+$536K$832K5.4%
Year 2$305K+$804K$1.1M7.3%
Year 3$315K+$804K$1.1M7.3%
Year 4$324K+$804K$1.1M7.4%
Year 5$334K+$804K$1.1M7.4%
$2.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$12.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$9.6M
Value Created
$1.1M
Exit EBITDA
$458K
Organic Growth
$8.0M
RCM Value Creation
$1.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$153K$229K$305K$367K
Denial Rate Reductio$151K$227K$302K$363K
A/R Days Reduction$93K$139K$186K$223K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$402K$603K$804K$964K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 91 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.9%-16.4%0.4%8.5%
P54
Net-to-Gross14.2%18.5%30.7%42.4%
P12
Occupancy42.5%31.9%52.8%72.4%
P38
Rev/Bed$305K$414K$755K$1.5M
P11
Exp/Bed$300K$400K$871K$1.5M
P11

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML