Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — POST ACUTE MEDICAL AT NANTICOKE 2026-04-26 13:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — POST ACUTE MEDICAL AT NANTICOKE
CCN 392025 | PA | 36 beds | Current EBITDA $76K → Pro Forma $721K (+$645K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$12.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$76K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$645K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$721K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+529bps
Margin Improvement
$468K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$645K
Modeled Uplift
$432K
Risk-Adjusted
-$213K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$244K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$243K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$148K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+8bp
Total EBITDA Impact$645K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$244K$244K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$235K$8K$243K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$37K$111K$148K$468K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT43.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$61K$122K$183K$244K$244K$244K$244K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$61K$122K$182K$243K$243K$243K$243K
A/R Days Reduction$0$49K$99K$148K$148K$148K$148K$148K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$176K$352K$523K$645K$645K$645K$645K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $645K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x132% / 67.2x137% / 75.0x142% / 82.9x144% / 86.8x146% / 90.7x
9.0x126% / 59.4x131% / 66.3x136% / 73.3x138% / 76.8x140% / 80.3x
10.0x121% / 53.1x126% / 59.4x131% / 65.7x133% / 68.8x135% / 71.9x
11.0x117% / 48.0x122% / 53.7x126% / 59.4x128% / 62.2x131% / 65.1x
12.0x113% / 43.7x118% / 48.9x122% / 54.2x124% / 56.8x126% / 59.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.6x
Headroom (turns)
86%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 86% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.9x, adding 7.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$76K$76K0.6%
Year 1$78K+$430K$509K4.2%
Year 2$81K+$645K$726K6.0%
Year 3$83K+$645K$728K6.0%
Year 4$86K+$645K$731K6.0%
Year 5$88K+$645K$734K6.0%
$761K
Entry EV (10x)
$8.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$7.3M
Value Created
$734K
Exit EBITDA
$121K
Organic Growth
$6.5M
RCM Value Creation
$734K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$122K$183K$244K$293K
Denial Rate Reductio$122K$182K$243K$292K
A/R Days Reduction$74K$111K$148K$178K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$323K$484K$645K$774K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 78 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.6%-13.3%0.4%8.4%
P50
Net-to-Gross28.4%21.7%31.7%43.3%
P40
Occupancy48.4%26.2%43.4%63.3%
P54
Rev/Bed$339K$415K$849K$1.6M
P14
Exp/Bed$337K$407K$1.0M$1.5M
P12

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML