Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — EDGEWOOD SURGICAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 17:17 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — EDGEWOOD SURGICAL HOSPITAL
CCN 390307 | PA | 10 beds | Current EBITDA $3.3M → Pro Forma $4.3M (+$1.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$19.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$761K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$1.0M
Modeled Uplift
$629K
Risk-Adjusted
-$414K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 60% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $1.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$397K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$393K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$241K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$13K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$397K$397K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$382K$11K$393K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$61K$180K$241K$761K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$13K$13K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$99K$198K$297K$397K$397K$397K$397K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$98K$196K$294K$393K$393K$393K$393K
A/R Days Reduction$0$80K$161K$241K$241K$241K$241K$241K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K
Cumulative$0$284K$568K$846K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.8x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x
9.0x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x
10.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x
11.0x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.5x45% / 6.3x47% / 6.8x48% / 7.2x
12.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.5x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.1x
Headroom (turns)
1%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 1% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.4x, adding 2.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.3M$3.3M16.6%
Year 1$3.4M+$696K$4.1M20.6%
Year 2$3.5M+$1.0M$4.5M22.9%
Year 3$3.6M+$1.0M$4.6M23.4%
Year 4$3.7M+$1.0M$4.7M23.9%
Year 5$3.8M+$1.0M$4.9M24.5%
$32.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$53.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$20.5M
Value Created
$4.9M
Exit EBITDA
$5.2M
Organic Growth
$10.4M
RCM Value Creation
$4.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$198K$297K$397K$476K
Denial Rate Reductio$196K$294K$393K$471K
A/R Days Reduction$121K$181K$241K$290K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$10K$13K$15K
Total$522K$782K$1.0M$1.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 16 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin16.6%-30.0%-8.7%7.8%
P75
Net-to-Gross28.0%26.1%28.0%35.6%
P44
Occupancy8.0%11.7%19.7%31.7%
P12
Rev/Bed$2.0M$890K$1.2M$2.8M
P62
Exp/Bed$1.7M$1.1M$1.4M$2.8M
P62

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML