Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIV. HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 04:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIV. HOSPITAL
CCN 390174 | PA | 868 beds | Current EBITDA $-445.5M → Pro Forma $-343.8M (+$101.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.93B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-445.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$101.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-343.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$74.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$101.7M
Modeled Uplift
$67.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$34.5M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $67.2M (vs $101.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$38.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$38.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$23.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$1.2M
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$101.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$38.6M$38.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$37.2M$1.1M$38.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$5.9M$17.6M$23.5M$74.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$1.2M$1.2M$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$9.7M$19.3M$29.0M$38.6M$38.6M$38.6M$38.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$9.6M$19.1M$28.7M$38.3M$38.3M$38.3M$38.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$7.8M$15.7M$23.5M$23.5M$23.5M$23.5M$23.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$618K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Cumulative$0$27.7M$55.4M$82.4M$101.7M$101.7M$101.7M$101.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $101.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-445.5M$-445.5M-23.1%
Year 1$-458.9M+$67.8M$-391.1M-20.2%
Year 2$-472.6M+$101.7M$-371.0M-19.2%
Year 3$-486.8M+$101.7M$-385.2M-19.9%
Year 4$-501.4M+$101.7M$-399.8M-20.7%
Year 5$-516.5M+$101.7M$-414.8M-21.5%
$-4.45B
Entry EV (10x)
$-4.56B
Exit EV (11x)
$-107.8M
Value Created
$-414.8M
Exit EBITDA
$-709.6M
Organic Growth
$1.02B
RCM Value Creation
$-414.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$19.3M$29.0M$38.6M$46.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$19.1M$28.7M$38.3M$45.9M
A/R Days Reduction$11.8M$17.6M$23.5M$28.2M
Clean Claim Rate$618K$928K$1.2M$1.5M
Total$50.8M$76.2M$101.7M$122.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 17 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-23.1%-12.8%-2.8%4.1%
P6
Net-to-Gross27.4%17.3%27.4%31.3%
P47
Occupancy73.3%71.5%74.8%78.5%
P29
Rev/Bed$2.2M$2.0M$2.3M$3.0M
P41
Exp/Bed$2.7M$1.7M$2.4M$2.7M
P71

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML